Cited by 19Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Tailoring Carbon Nanotube Microsphere Architectures with Controlled Porosity

Open access
Zhang, Zishuai, Sadeghi, Mohammad Amin, Jervis, Rhodri, Ye, Siyu, Gostick, Jeff T., Barralet, Jake E, Merle, Geraldine·2019·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Nanomaterials are at the core of fuel cell electrodes, providing high‐area catalytic, proton, and electron conducting surfaces, traditionally on carbon black supports. Other carbons, e.g., carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene are less prone to oxidation; however, their handling is not trivial due to health risks associated with their size. Assembling them into microscale structures without jeopardizing their performance is ideal, but there are mass transfer limitations as thickness increases. In this work, a soluble acicular calcium carbonate (aragonite) is used as a porogen to create connected porosity in microspheres. Increasing macroporosity has a considerable positive impact on the mass transfer process. The experimental manipulation of porosity of the microspheres is combined with pore network modeling to better understand how pore distribution throughout the whole microsphere can optimize platinum utilization decorated onto the CNTs. Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity is compared with the prepared composite materials and a commercial Pt/C catalyst for 4 weeks. The composite materials exhibit a highly interconnected network resulting in a 3.4 times higher ORR activity (at 0.9 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode) than that of the nanoporous spheres with no macroporosity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201903983

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Z., Sadeghi, M. A., Jervis, R., Ye, S., Gostick, J. T., Barralet, J. E., & Merle, G.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Ballard Power Systems (Canada) (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Barralet, Jake E
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-12
Volume
29
Issue
42
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W2968020072
Cited by
19
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
porosity control, macroporosity, pore network model, platinum catalysts, oxygen reduction reaction, fuel cell electrodes, mass transfer, platinum utilization, nanoporous carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review