The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct 3D Printed Biomimetic Scaffolds Based on Hydrogel Microparticles for Cell Spheroid Growth
Abstract
Biocompatible hydrogel inks with shear‐thinning, appropriate yield strength, and fast self‐healing are desired for 3D bioprinting. However, the lack of ideal 3D bioprinting inks with outstanding printability and high structural fidelity, as well as cell‐compatibility, has hindered the progress of extrusion‐based 3D bioprinting for tissue engineering. In this study, novel self‐healable pre‐cross‐linked hydrogel microparticles (pc HμPs) of chitosan methacrylate (CHMA) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hybrid hydrogels are developed and used as bioinks for extrusion‐based 3D printing of scaffolds with high fidelity and biocompatibility. The pc HμPs display excellent shear thinning when injected through a syringe and subsequently self‐heal into gels as shear forces are removed. Numerical simulations indicate that the pc HμPs experience a plug flow in the nozzle with minimal disturbance, which favors a steady and continuous printing. Moreover, the pc HμPs show a self‐supportive yield strength (540 Pa), which is critical for the fidelity of printed constructs. A series of biomimetic constructs with very high aspect ratio and delicate fine structures are directly printed by using the pc HμP ink. The 3D printed scaffolds support the growth of bone‐marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells and formation of cell spheroids, which are most important for tissue engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips
Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,834
3D bioprinting of collagen to rebuild components of the human heart
Lee, A., Hudson, A. R., Shiwarski, D. J., Tashman, J. W., Hinton, T. J., Yerneni, S., Bliley, J. M., Campbell, P. G., & Feinberg, A. W. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav9051 · Cited by 1,782
Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease
Fatehullah, A., Tan, S. H., & Barker, N. (2016) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3312 · Cited by 1,508
Biofabrication strategies for 3D in vitro models and regenerative medicine
Moroni, L., Burdick, J. A., Highley, C., Lee, S. J., Morimoto, Y., Takeuchi, S., & Yoo, J. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0006-y · Cited by 753
Cited by
Synthetic hydrogels: Synthesis, novel trends, and applications
Madduma‐Bandarage, U. S. K., & Madihally, S. V. (2021) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.50376 · Cited by 517
Design, printing, and engineering of regenerative biomaterials for personalized bone healthcare
Jia, Z., Xu, X., Zhu, D., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101072 · Cited by 176
Fang, Y., Guo, Y., Wu, B., Liu, Z., Ye, M., Xu, Y., Ji, M., Chen, L., Lu, B., Nie, K., et al. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202205082 · Cited by 155
In situ 3D bioprinting: a promising technique in advanced biofabrication strategies
Mahmoudi, Z., Sedighi, M., Jafari, A., Naghieh, S., Stefanek, E., Akbari, M., & Savoji, H. (2023) · Bioprinting · doi:10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00260 · Cited by 38
Gao, Q., Yu, K., Chen, F., Lu, L., & Zhang, P. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14102108 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Cong, Y., Osi, A. R., Zhou, Y., Huang, F., Zaccaria, R. P., Chen, J., Wang, R., & Fu, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 13
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W3006552154
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct 3D Printed Biomimetic Scaffolds Based on Hydrogel Microparticles for Cell Spheroid Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201910573
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Cong, Y., Osi, A. R., Zhou, Y., Huang, F., Zaccaria, R. P., Chen, J., Wang, R., & Fu, J. (2020). Direct 3D Printed Biomimetic Scaffolds Based on Hydrogel Microparticles for Cell Spheroid Growth. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.