Cited by 264Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceAdvanced oxidation water treatment

Transition metal-based catalysts for urea oxidation reaction (UOR): Catalyst design strategies, applications, and future perspectives

Xu, Shan, Ruan, Xiaowen, Ganesan, Muthusankar, Wu, Jiandong, Ravi, Sai Kishore, Cui, Xiaoqiang·2024·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

Urea oxidation reaction (UOR) has garnered significant attention in recent years as a promising and sustainable clean‐energy technology. Urea‐containing wastewater poses severe threats to the environment and human health. Numerous studies hence focus on developing UOR as a viable process for simultaneously remediating wastewater and converting it into energy. Moreover, UOR, which has a thermodynamic potential of 0.37 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE), shows great promise in replacing the energy‐intensive oxygen evolution reaction (OER; 1.23 V vs RHE). The versatility and stability of urea, particularly at ambient temperatures, make it an attractive alternative to hydrogen in fuel cells. Since UOR entails a complex intermediate adsorption/desorption process, many studies are devoted to designing cost‐effective and efficient catalysts. Notably, transition metal‐based materials with regulated d orbitals have demonstrated significant potential for the UOR process. However, comprehensive reviews focusing on transition metal‐based catalysts remain scarce. In light of this, the review aims to bridge the gap by offering an in‐depth and systematic overview of cutting‐edge design strategies for transition metal‐based catalysts and their diverse applications in UOR. Additionally, the review delves into the status quo and future directions, charting the course for further advancements in this exciting field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.202313309

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, S., Ruan, X., Ganesan, M., Wu, J., Ravi, S. K., & Cui, X.
Affiliations
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Ruan, Xiaowen
  • Ravi, Sai Kishore
  • Cui, Xiaoqiang
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-21
Volume
34
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W4391107918
Cited by
264
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 58
FWCI
17.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872116, 12034002, 22279044)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  • City University of Hong Kong (9610577)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
Keywords
urea oxidation reaction, transition metal catalysts, electrocatalyst design, oxygen evolution reaction alternative, fuel cells, electrocatalyst stability, energy conversion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review