The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Purified Graphene Oxide Dispersions Lack In Vitro Cytotoxicity and In Vivo Pathogenicity
Open accessAbstract
Prompted by the excitement from the description of single layer graphene, increased attention for potential applications in the biomedical field has been recently placed on graphene oxide (GO). Determination of the opportunities and limitations that GO offers in biomedicine are particularly prone to inaccuracies due to wide variability in the preparation methodologies of GO material in different laboratories, that results in significant variation in the purity of the material and the yield of the oxidation reactions, primarily the Hummers method used. Herein, the fabrication of highly pure, colloidally stable, and evenly dispersed GO in physiologically‐relevant aqueous buffers in comparison to conventional GO is investigated. The purified GO material is thoroughly characterized by a battery of techniques, and is shown to consist of single layer GO sheets of lateral dimensions below 500 nm. The cytotoxic impact of the GO in vitro and its inflammation profile in vivo is investigated. The purified GO prepared and characterized here does not induce significant cytotoxic responses in vitro, or inflammation and granuloma formation in vivo following intraperitoneal injection. This is one of the initial steps towards determination of the safety risks associated with GO material that may be interacting with living tissue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays
Wörle-Knirsch, J. M., Pulskamp, K., & Krug, H. F. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl060177c · Cited by 994
Physico-chemical features of engineered nanoparticles relevant to their toxicity
Fubini, B., Ghiazza, M., & Fenoglio, I. (2010) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2010.509519 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Nanotoxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide
Seabra, A. B., Paula, A. J., de Lima, R., Alves, O. L., & Durán, N. (2014) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx400385x · Cited by 893
Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug and/or gene delivery, bioimaging, and tissue engineering
Zhao, H., Ding, R., Zhao, X., Li, Y., Qu, L., Pei, H., Yildirimer, L., Wu, Z., & Zhang, W. (2017) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.04.002 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali‐Boucetta, H., Bitounis, D., Raveendran‐Nair, R., Servant, A., Van den Bossche, J., & Kostarelos, K.
- Venue
- Advanced Healthcare Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-441
- ISSN
- 2192-2640 (ISSN-L)
- 2192-2659
- OpenAlex
- W2069499037
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Purified Graphene Oxide Dispersions Lack In Vitro Cytotoxicity and In Vivo Pathogenicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adhm.201200248
- The paper
- Ali‐Boucetta, H., Bitounis, D., Raveendran‐Nair, R., Servant, A., Van den Bossche, J., & Kostarelos, K. (2013). Purified Graphene Oxide Dispersions Lack In Vitro Cytotoxicity and In Vivo Pathogenicity. Advanced Healthcare Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.