Cited by 994Graphene and Nanomaterials ApplicationsNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays

Wörle-Knirsch, J. M., Pulskamp, K., Krug, H. F.·2006·Nano Letters

Abstract

New materials of emerging technological importance are single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). Because SWCNTs will be used in commercial products in huge amounts, their effects on human health and the environment have been addressed in several studies. Inhalation studies in vivo and submerse applications in vitro have been described with diverging results. Why some indicate a strong cytotoxicity and some do not is what we report on here. Data from A549 cells incubated with carbon nanotubes fake a strong cytotoxic effect within the MTT assay after 24 h that reaches roughly 50%, whereas the same treatment with SWCNTs, but detection with WST-1, reveals no cytotoxicity. LDH, FACS-assisted mitochondrial membrane potential determination, and Annexin-V/PI staining also reveal no cytotocicity. SWCNTs appear to interact with some tetrazolium salts such as MTT but not with others (such as WST-1, INT, XTT). This interference does not seem to affect the enzymatic reaction but lies rather in the insoluble nature of MTT-formazan. Our findings strongly suggest verifying cytotoxicity data with at least two or more independent test systems for this new class of materials (nanomaterials). Moreover, we intensely recommend standardizing nanotoxicological assays with regard to the material used: there is a clear need for reference materials. MTT-formazan crystals formed in the MTT reaction are lumped with nanotubes and offer a potential mechanism to guide bioremediation and clearance for SWCNTs…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl060177c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These same particle properties often interfere with experimental test systems.

    “However, these same particle properties often interfere with experimental test systems (Wörle-Knirsch et al., 2006; Laurent et al., 2012; Bohmer et al., 2018).”

    From In Vitro research Reproducibility: Keeping up High Standards (2019) · cites this paper as Wörle-Knirsch et al., 2006

  • Nanomaterials have demonstrated chemical interference in cytotoxicity assays (e.g., carbon nanotubes interfering with MTT, engineered nanoparticles producing assay-dependent toxicity estimates, nanomaterial adsorption of marker enzymes causing artefacts).

    “This problem has been demonstrated particularly clearly for nanomaterials, where carbon nanotubes interfered with MTT-based viability measurements, engineered nanoparticles produced assay-dependent toxicity estimates, and nanomaterial adsorption of marker enzymes caused artefacts in cytotoxicity assays (Wohlleben et al., 2011; Wörle-Knirsch et al., 2006; Monteiro-Riviere et al., 2009).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wörle-Knirsch, J. M., Pulskamp, K., & Krug, H. F.
Affiliations
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institute of Toxicology and Genetics, Department of Molecular and Environmental Toxicology, P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Corresponding author
Krug, H. F.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2006-04-27
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
1261-1268
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2074947593
Cited by
994
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 83
FWCI
50.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
single-walled carbon nanotubes, cytotoxicity, tetrazolium salts, formazan, A549 cells, reference materials, mitochondrial membrane potential, Annexin V/PI staining, LDH, tissue engineering scaffolds
MeSH terms
Cell Survival, Fraud, Lethal Dose 50, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Risk Assessment, Toxicity Tests, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nanotubes, Carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review