Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 588

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Lithiated MoO3 Nanobelts with Greatly Improved Performance for Lithium Batteries

Mai, L. Q., Hu, B., Chen, W., Qi, Y. Y., Lao, C. S., Yang, R. S., Dai, Y., Wang, Z. L.·2007·Advanced Materials

Abstract

α-MoO3 nanobelts are successfully lithiated by a secondary reaction. The capacity retention rate of lithiated MoO3 nanobelts is 92 % after 15 cycles, whereas the non-lithiated nanobelts retain only 60 % (see figure). The conductivity is increased by close to two orders of magnitudes after lithiation suggesting that Li+ ions have been introduced into the MoO3 layers during lithiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.200700883

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 588

Metadata

Authors
Mai, L. Q., Hu, B., Chen, W., Qi, Y. Y., Lao, C. S., Yang, R. S., Dai, Y., & Wang, Z. L.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-05
Volume
19
Issue
21
Pages
3712-3716
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2147225736
Cited by
588
References
0
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithiated MoO3 Nanobelts with Greatly Improved Performance for Lithium Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.200700883
The paper
Mai, L. Q., Hu, B., Chen, W., Qi, Y. Y., Lao, C. S., Yang, R. S., Dai, Y., & Wang, Z. L. (2007). Lithiated MoO3 Nanobelts with Greatly Improved Performance for Lithium Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700883

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.