Cited by 711Advancements in Battery MaterialsSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationMXene and MAX Phase Materials

Nanostructured Mo-based electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage

Hu, Xianluo, Zhang, Wei, Liu, Xiaoxiao, Mei, Yueni, Huang, Yunhui·2015·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

The development of advanced energy storage devices is at the forefront of research geared towards a sustainable future. Nanostructured materials are advantageous in offering huge surface to volume ratios, favorable transport features, and attractive physicochemical properties. They have been extensively explored in various fields of energy storage and conversion. This review is focused largely on the recent progress in nanostructured Mo-based electrode materials including molybdenum oxides (MoO(x), 2 ≤ x ≤ 3), dichalconides (MoX2, X = S, Se), and oxysalts for rechargeable lithium/sodium-ion batteries, Mg batteries, and supercapacitors. Mo-based compounds including MoO2, MoO3, MoO(3-y) (0 < y < 1), MMo(x)O(y) (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Ca, Mn, Zn, Mg, or Cd; x = 1, y = 4; x = 3, y = 8), MoS2, MoSe2, (MoO2)2P2O7, LiMoO2, Li2MoO3, etc. possess multiple valence states and exhibit rich chemistry. They are very attractive candidates for efficient electrochemical energy storage systems because of their unique physicochemical properties, such as conductivity, mechanical and thermal stability, and cyclability. In this review, we aim to provide a systematic summary of the synthesis, modification, and electrochemical performance of nanostructured Mo-based compounds, as well as their energy storage applications in lithium/sodium-ion batteries, Mg batteries, and pseudocapacitors. The relationship between nanoarchitectures and electrochemical performances as well as the related charge-storage mechan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4cs00350k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, X., Zhang, W., Liu, X., Mei, Y., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Xianluo
  • Huang, Yunhui
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2015
Volume
44
Issue
8
Pages
2376-2404
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2049757361
Cited by
711
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 16
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Society Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › MXene and MAX Phase Materials
Keywords
nanostructured materials, molybdenum oxide, dichalcogenides, MoS2, MoSe2, lithium-ion batteries, sodium-ion batteries, magnesium batteries, supercapacitors, pseudocapacitors, charge storage mechanism, nanoarchitectures, electrochemical energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review