The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicity Evaluation for Safe Use of Nanomaterials: Recent Achievements and Technical Challenges
Abstract
Recent developments in the field of nanotechnology involving the synthesis of novel nanomaterials (NM) have attracted the attention of numerous scientists owing to the possibility of degradative perturbations in human health. This Review evaluates previous investigations related to NM toxicity studies using biological models and describes the limitations that often prevent toxicologists from identifying whether NM pose a real hazard to human health. One major limitation to assess toxicity is the characterization of the NM prior to and after exposure to living cells or animals. The most relevant physicochemical characteristics of NM are: size, surface chemistry, crystallinity, morphology, solubility, aggregation tendency, homogeneity of dispersions, and turbidity. All of these properties need to be assessed in order to determine their contribution to toxicity. Due to the lack of appropriate methods to determine the physicochemical nature of nanoparticles in biological systems, the exact nature of NM toxicity is not fully described or understood at this time. This Review emphasizes the need for state‐of‐the‐art physicochemical characterization, the determination of appropriate exposure protocols and reliable methods for assessing NM internalization and their kinetics in living organisms. Once these issues are addressed, optimal experimental conditions could be established in order to identify if NM pose a threat to human health. Multidisciplinary research between materials scientists and life scientists should overcome these limitations in identifying the true hazards of NM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticle Technology for Drug Delivery Across the Blood-Brain Barrier
Lockman, P. R., Mumper, R. J., Khan, M. A., & Allen, D. D. (2002) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.1081/ddc-120001481 · Cited by 592
Cited by
Kittler, S., Greulich, C., Diendorf, J., Köller, M., & Epple, M. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm100023p · Cited by 1,126
Soenen, S. J., Rivera-Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Parak, W. J., De Smedt, S. C., & Braeckmans, K. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.001 · Cited by 699
Time course of lung retention and toxicity of inhaled particles: short-term exposure to nano-Ceria
Keller, J., Wohlleben, W., Ma-Hock, L., Strauss, V., Gröters, S., Küttler, K., Wiench, K., Herden, C., Oberdörster, G., van Ravenzwaay, B., et al. (2014) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-014-1349-9 · Cited by 115
Refining in vitro models for nanomaterial exposure to cells and tissues
Guggenheim, E. J., Milani, S., Röttgermann, P. J. F., Dusinska, M., Saout, C., Salvati, A., Rädler, J. O., & Lynch, I. (2018) · NanoImpact · doi:10.1016/j.impact.2018.02.008 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Hussain, S. M., Braydich‐Stolle, L. K., Schrand, A. M., Murdock, R. C., Yu, K. O., Mattie, D. M., Schlager, J. J., & Terrones, M.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-21
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1549-1559
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2059086967
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity Evaluation for Safe Use of Nanomaterials: Recent Achievements and Technical Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.200801395
- The paper
- Hussain, S. M., Braydich‐Stolle, L. K., Schrand, A. M., Murdock, R. C., Yu, K. O., Mattie, D. M., Schlager, J. J., & Terrones, M. (2009). Toxicity Evaluation for Safe Use of Nanomaterials: Recent Achievements and Technical Challenges. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200801395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.