Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Self‐Healing Materials

Hager, Martin D., Greil, Peter, Leyens, Christoph, van der Zwaag, Sybrand, Schubert, Ulrich S.·2010·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Self‐healing materials are able to partially or completely heal damage inflicted on them, e.g., crack formation; it is anticipated that the original functionality can be restored. This article covers the design and generic principles of self‐healing materials through a wide range of different material classes including metals, ceramics, concrete, and polymers. Recent key developments and future challenges in the field of self‐healing materials are summarised, and generic, fundamental material‐independent principles and mechanism are discussed and evaluated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201003036

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,238

Metadata

Authors
Hager, M. D., Greil, P., Leyens, C., van der Zwaag, S., & Schubert, U. S.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-13
Volume
22
Issue
47
Pages
5424-5430
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2106880554
Cited by
1,238
References
0
FWCI
33.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐Healing Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201003036
The paper
Hager, M. D., Greil, P., Leyens, C., van der Zwaag, S., & Schubert, U. S. (2010). Self‐Healing Materials. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201003036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.