The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Overview and Future Perspectives of Aluminum Batteries
Open accessAbstract
A critical overview of the latest developments in the aluminum battery technologies is reported. The substitution of lithium with alternative metal anodes characterized by lower cost and higher abundance is nowadays one of the most widely explored paths to reduce the cost of electrochemical storage systems and enable long‐term sustainability. Aluminum based secondary batteries could be a viable alternative to the present Li‐ion technology because of their high volumetric capacity (8040 mAh cm−3 for Al vs 2046 mAh cm−3 for Li). Additionally, the low cost aluminum makes these batteries appealing for large‐scale electrical energy storage. Here, we describe the evolution of the various aluminum systems, starting from those based on aqueous electrolytes to, in more details, those based on non‐aqueous electrolytes. Particular attention has been dedicated to the latest development of electrolytic media characterized by low reactivity towards other cell components. The attention is then focused on electrode materials enabling the reversible aluminum intercalation‐deintercalation process. Finally, we touch on the topic of high‐capacity aluminum‐sulfur batteries, attempting to forecast their chances to reach the status of practical energy storage systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aluminum–air battery based on an ionic liquid electrolyte
Gelman, D., Shvartsev, B., & Ein-Eli, Y. (2014) · J. Mater. Chem. A · doi:10.1039/c4ta04721d · Cited by 164
Cited by
Rechargeable Batteries for Grid Scale Energy Storage
Zhu, Z., Jiang, T., Ali, M., Meng, Y., Jin, Y., Cui, Y., & Chen, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00289 · Cited by 1,769
Vanadium‐Based Nanomaterials: A Promising Family for Emerging Metal‐Ion Batteries
Xu, X., Xiong, F., Meng, J., Wang, X., Niu, C., An, Q., & Mai, L. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201904398 · Cited by 482
An Overview and Future Perspectives of Rechargeable Zinc Batteries
Shi, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, L., Wang, K., Wang, B., Li, L., Ma, Y., Li, Y., Sun, Z., Ali, W., et al. (2020) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202000730 · Cited by 389
Self-diffusion barriers: possible descriptors for dendrite growth in batteries?
Jäckle, M., Helmbrecht, K., Smits, M., Stottmeister, D., & Groß, A. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01448e · Cited by 365
Wang, W., Cao, Z., Elia, G. A., Wu, Y., Wahyudi, W., Abou-Hamad, E., Emwas, A.-H., Cavallo, L., Li, L.-J., & Ming, J. (2018) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01945 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Elia, G. A., Marquardt, K., Hoeppner, K., Fantini, S., Lin, R., Knipping, E., Peters, W., Drillet, J., Passerini, S., & Hahn, R.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 7564-7579
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2474258783
- Cited by
- 890
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Overview and Future Perspectives of Aluminum Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201601357
- The paper
- Elia, G. A., Marquardt, K., Hoeppner, K., Fantini, S., Lin, R., Knipping, E., Peters, W., Drillet, J., Passerini, S., & Hahn, R. (2016). An Overview and Future Perspectives of Aluminum Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201601357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
