Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reliable Piezoelectricity in Bilayer WSe2 for Piezoelectric Nanogenerators

Lee, Ju‐Hyuck, Park, Jae Young, Cho, Eun Bi, Kim, Tae Yun, Han, Sang A., Kim, Tae‐Ho, Liu, Yanan, Kim, Sung Kyun, Roh, Chang Jae, Yoon, Hong‐Joon, Ryu, Hanjun, Seung, Wanchul, Lee, Jong Seok, Lee, Jaichan, Kim, Sang‐Woo·2017·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Recently, piezoelectricity has been observed in 2D atomically thin materials, such as hexagonal‐boron nitride, graphene, and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). Specifically, exfoliated monolayer MoS 2 exhibits a high piezoelectricity that is comparable to that of traditional piezoelectric materials. However, monolayer TMD materials are not regarded as suitable for actual piezoelectric devices due to their insufficient mechanical durability for sustained operation while Bernal‐stacked bilayer TMD materials lose noncentrosymmetry and consequently piezoelectricity. Here, it is shown that WSe 2 bilayers fabricated via turbostratic stacking have reliable piezoelectric properties that cannot be obtained from a mechanically exfoliated WSe 2 bilayer with Bernal stacking. Turbostratic stacking refers to the transfer of each chemical vapor deposition (CVD)‐grown WSe 2 monolayer to allow for an increase in degrees of freedom in the bilayer symmetry, leading to noncentrosymmetry in the bilayers. In contrast, CVD‐grown WSe 2 bilayers exhibit very weak piezoelectricity because of the energetics and crystallographic orientation. The flexible piezoelectric WSe 2 bilayers exhibit a prominent mechanical durability of up to 0.95% of strain as well as reliable energy harvesting performance, which is adequate to drive a small liquid crystal display without external energy sources, in contrast to monolayer WSe 2 for which the device performance becomes degraded above a strain of 0.63%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201606667

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J., Park, J. Y., Cho, E. B., Kim, T. Y., Han, S. A., Kim, T., Liu, Y., Kim, S. K., Roh, C. J., Yoon, H., Ryu, H., Seung, W., Lee, J. S., Lee, J., & Kim, S.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-06
Volume
29
Issue
29
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2624507141
Cited by
225
References
1
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliable Piezoelectricity in Bilayer WSe2 for Piezoelectric Nanogenerators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201606667
The paper
Lee, J., Park, J. Y., Cho, E. B., Kim, T. Y., Han, S. A., Kim, T., Liu, Y., Kim, S. K., Roh, C. J., Yoon, H., Ryu, H., Seung, W., Lee, J. S., Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2017). Reliable Piezoelectricity in Bilayer WSe2 for Piezoelectric Nanogenerators. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606667

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.