Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 207 of the 207 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Photoelectrochemical Water‐Splitting Using CuO‐Based Electrodes for Hydrogen Production: A Review

Open access
Siavash Moakhar, Roozbeh, Hosseini‐Hosseinabad, Seyed Morteza, Masudy‐Panah, Saeid, Seza, Ashkan, Jalali, Mahsa, Fallah‐Arani, Hesam, Dabir, Fatemeh, Gholipour, Somayeh, Abdi, Yaser, Bagheri‐Hariri, Mohiedin, Riahi‐Noori, Nastaran, Lim, Yee‐Fun, Hagfeldt, Anders, Saliba, Michael·2021·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The cost‐effective, robust, and efficient electrocatalysts for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water‐splitting has been extensively studied over the past decade to address a solution for the energy crisis. The interesting physicochemical properties of CuO have introduced this promising photocathodic material among the few photocatalysts with a narrow bandgap. This photocatalyst has a high activity for the PEC hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) under simulated sunlight irradiation. Here, the recent advancements of CuO‐based photoelectrodes, including undoped CuO, doped CuO, and CuO composites, in the PEC water‐splitting field, are comprehensively studied. Moreover, the synthesis methods, characterization, and fundamental factors of each classification are discussed in detail. Apart from the exclusive characteristics of CuO‐based photoelectrodes, the PEC properties of CuO/2D materials, as groups of the growing nanocomposites in photocurrent‐generating devices, are discussed in separate sections. Regarding the particular attention paid to the CuO heterostructure photocathodes, the PEC water splitting application is reviewed and the properties of each group such as electronic structures, defects, bandgap, and hierarchical structures are critically assessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202007285

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 207 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Siavash Moakhar, R., Hosseini‐Hosseinabad, S. M., Masudy‐Panah, S., Seza, A., Jalali, M., Fallah‐Arani, H., Dabir, F., Gholipour, S., Abdi, Y., Bagheri‐Hariri, M., Riahi‐Noori, N., Lim, Y., Hagfeldt, A., & Saliba, M.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-12
Volume
33
Issue
33
Pages
e2007285-e2007285
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W3166417682
Cited by
308
References
207
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photoelectrochemical Water‐Splitting Using CuO‐Based Electrodes for Hydrogen Production: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202007285
The paper
Siavash Moakhar, R., Hosseini‐Hosseinabad, S. M., Masudy‐Panah, S., Seza, A., Jalali, M., Fallah‐Arani, H., Dabir, F., Gholipour, S., Abdi, Y., Bagheri‐Hariri, M., Riahi‐Noori, N., Lim, Y., Hagfeldt, A., & Saliba, M. (2021). Photoelectrochemical Water‐Splitting Using CuO‐Based Electrodes for Hydrogen Production: A Review. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.