The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategies for Improving the Functionality of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: Tailoring Nanoarchitectures for Functional Applications
Abstract
Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), a subclass of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) built with tetrahedral metal ions and imidazolates, offer permanent porosity and high thermal and chemical stabilities. While ZIFs possess some attractive physical and chemical properties, it remains important to enhance their functionality for practical application. Here, an overview of the extensive strategies which have been developed to improve the functionality of ZIFs is provided, including linker modifications, functional hybridization of ZIFs via the encapsulation of guest species (such as metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and biomolecules) into ZIFs, and hybridization with polymeric matrices to form mixed matrix membranes for industrial gas and liquid separations. Furthermore, the developed strategies for achieving size and shape control of ZIF nanocrystals are considered, which are important for optimizing the textural characteristics as well as the functional performance of ZIFs and their derived materials/hybrids. Moreover, the recent trends of using ZIFs as templates for the derivation of nanoporous hybrid materials, including carbon/metal, carbon/oxide, carbon/sulfide, and carbon/phosphide hybrids, are discussed. Finally, some perspectives on the potential future research directions and applications for ZIFs and ZIF‐derived materials are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates
Wan, Y., & Zhao (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068020s · Cited by 2,371
Jiao, L., Zhou, Y.-X., & Jiang, H.-L. (2016) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c5sc04425a · Cited by 798
You, B., Jiang, N., Sheng, M., Gul, S., Yano, J., & Sun, Y. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02877 · Cited by 631
Cited by
Wu, H. B., & Lou, X. W. (. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9252 · Cited by 1,103
Recent progress in metal-organic frameworks as active materials for supercapacitors
Wang, K.-B., Xun, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100025 · Cited by 474
Cheng, N., Ren, L., Xu, X., Du, Y., & Dou, S. X. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201801257 · Cited by 359
Wang, C., Kim, J., Malgras, V., Na, J., Lin, J., You, J., Zhang, M., Li, J., & Yamauchi, Y. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201900744 · Cited by 294
Self-citationControllable Syntheses of MOF‐Derived Materials
Zou, K., & Li, Z. (2018) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201705415 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaneti, Y. V., Dutta, S., Hossain, M. S. A., Shiddiky, M. J. A., Tung, K., Shieh, F., Tsung, C., Wu, K. C. ‐., & Yamauchi, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-18
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 38
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2748556896
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies for Improving the Functionality of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: Tailoring Nanoarchitectures for Functional Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201700213
- The paper
- Kaneti, Y. V., Dutta, S., Hossain, M. S. A., Shiddiky, M. J. A., Tung, K., Shieh, F., Tsung, C., Wu, K. C. ‐., & Yamauchi, Y. (2017). Strategies for Improving the Functionality of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: Tailoring Nanoarchitectures for Functional Applications. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.