The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D‐Printing Electrolytes for Solid‐State Batteries
Abstract
Solid‐state batteries have many enticing advantages in terms of safety and stability, but the solid electrolytes upon which these batteries are based typically lead to high cell resistance. Both components of the resistance (interfacial, due to poor contact with electrolytes, and bulk, due to a thick electrolyte) are a result of the rudimentary manufacturing capabilities that exist for solid‐state electrolytes. In general, solid electrolytes are studied as flat pellets with planar interfaces, which minimizes interfacial contact area. Here, multiple ink formulations are developed that enable 3D printing of unique solid electrolyte microstructures with varying properties. These inks are used to 3D‐print a variety of patterns, which are then sintered to reveal thin, nonplanar, intricate architectures composed only of Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 solid electrolyte. Using these 3D‐printing ink formulations to further study and optimize electrolyte structure could lead to solid‐state batteries with dramatically lower full cell resistance and higher energy and power density. In addition, the reported ink compositions could be used as a model recipe for other solid electrolyte or ceramic inks, perhaps enabling 3D printing in related fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Cited by
Physicochemical Concepts of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid-State Batteries
Krauskopf, T., Richter, F. H., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 · Cited by 892
Reducing the thickness of solid-state electrolyte membranes for high-energy lithium batteries
Wu, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, W., Li, Z., Xie, X., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02241a · Cited by 425
Li-S Batteries: Challenges, Achievements and Opportunities
Raza, H., Bai, S., Cheng, J., Majumder, S., Zhu, H., Liu, Q., Zheng, G., Li, X., & Chen, G. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00188-4 · Cited by 406
Recent progress on solid-state hybrid electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries
Liang, J., Luo, J., Sun, Q., Yang, X., Li, R., & Sun, X. (2019) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.06.021 · Cited by 365
Additive Manufacturing of Batteries
Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906244 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- McOwen, D. W., Xu, S., Gong, Y., Wen, Y., Godbey, G. L., Gritton, J. E., Hamann, T. R., Dai, J., Hitz, G. T., Hu, L., & Wachsman, E. D.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-03-25
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- e1707132-e1707132
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2791537261
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D‐Printing Electrolytes for Solid‐State Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201707132
- The paper
- McOwen, D. W., Xu, S., Gong, Y., Wen, Y., Godbey, G. L., Gritton, J. E., Hamann, T. R., Dai, J., Hitz, G. T., Hu, L., & Wachsman, E. D. (2018). 3D‐Printing Electrolytes for Solid‐State Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201707132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.