The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Additive Manufacturing of Batteries
Abstract
Additive manufacturing, i.e., 3D printing, is being increasingly utilized to fabricate a variety of complex‐shaped electronics and energy devices (e.g., batteries, supercapacitors, and solar cells) due to its excellent process flexibility, good geometry controllability, as well as cost and material waste reduction. In this review, the recent advances in 3D printing of emerging batteries are emphasized and discussed. The recent progress in fabricating 3D‐printed batteries through the major 3D‐printing methods, including lithography‐based 3D printing, template‐assisted electrodeposition‐based 3D printing, inkjet printing, direct ink writing, fused deposition modeling, and aerosol jet printing, are first summarized. Then, the significant achievements made in the development and printing of battery electrodes and electrolytes are highlighted. Finally, major challenges are discussed and potential research frontiers in developing 3D‐printed batteries are proposed. It is expected that with the continuous development of printing techniques and materials, 3D‐printed batteries with long‐term durability, favorable safety as well as high energy and power density will eventually be widely used in many fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,197
Slater, M. D., Kim, D., Lee, E., & Johnson, C. S. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201200691 · Cited by 4,518
Stretchable, Skin-Mountable, and Wearable Strain Sensors and Their Potential Applications: A Review
Amjadi, M., Kyung, K., Park, I., & Sitti, M. (2016) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201504755 · Cited by 3,202
Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors
Javey, A., Guo, J., Wang, Q., Lundstrom, M., & Dai, H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01797 · Cited by 3,187
Gür, T. M. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01419a · Cited by 2,566
A Review of Additive Manufacturing
Wong, K. V., & Hernandez, A. (2012) · ISRN Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.5402/2012/208760 · Cited by 2,555
Lithium−Air Battery: Promise and Challenges
Girishkumar, G., McCloskey, B., Luntz, A. C., Swanson, S., & Wilcke, W. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz1005384 · Cited by 2,528
Cited by
Inkjet Printing and 3D Printing Strategies for Biosensing, Analytical, and Diagnostic Applications
Zub, K., Hoeppener, S., & Schubert, U. S. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202105015 · Cited by 287
Parale, V. G., Kim, T., Choi, H., Phadtare, V. D., Dhavale, R. P., Kanamori, K., & Park, H. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202307772 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10-30
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2982660856
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 110
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive Manufacturing of Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201906244
- The paper
- Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C. (2020). Additive Manufacturing of Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
