An Artificial Sensory Neuron with Tactile Perceptual Learning
Open accessAbstract
Sensory neurons within skin form an interface between the external physical reality and the inner tactile perception. This interface enables sensory information to be organized identified, and interpreted through perceptual learning—the process whereby the sensing abilities improve through experience. Here, an artificial sensory neuron that can integrate and differentiate the spatiotemporal features of touched patterns for recognition is shown. The system comprises sensing, transmitting, and processing components that are parallel to those found in a sensory neuron. A resistive pressure sensor converts pressure stimuli into electric signals, which are transmitted to a synaptic transistor through interfacial ionic/electronic coupling via a soft ionic conductor. Furthermore, the recognition error rate can be dramatically decreased from 44% to 0.4% by integrating with the machine learning method. This work represents a step toward the design and use of neuromorphic electronic skin with artificial intelligence for robotics and prosthetics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Artificial sensory neurons have been used to detect tactile, noxious, and mechanical stimuli.
“Another promising neuromorphic design for communication is artificial sensory neurons, which have already been applied to measure tactile, noxious, and mechanical stimuli.[440]”
From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [440]
The paper’s Abstract describes an artificial sensory neuron that detects touch patterns through a pressure sensor, supporting tactile and mechanical stimuli. It does not report detecting noxious stimuli; its reference to pain being alleviated by gentle strokes is an analogy for how two tactile inputs interact, not a noxious-stimulus measurement. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 418
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- [1]1. R. S. Dahiya, G. Metta, M. Valle, G. Sandini, IEEE T. Robot. 2010, 26, 1.
- [2]2. A. M. Fernandes, P. B. Albuquerque, Cogn. Process. 2012, 13, 285.
- [3]3. V. E. Abraira, D. D. Ginty, Neuron 2013, 79, 618.
- [4]4. E. A. Lumpkin, M. J. Caterina, Nature 2007, 445, 858.
- [5]5. W. R. Garner, Science 1970, 168, 958.
- [6]6. D. Y. Little, F. T. Sommer, Front Neural Circuits 2013, 7, 1.
- [7]7. B. C.-K. Tee, A. Chortos, A. Berndt, A. K. Nguyen, A. Tom, A. McGuire, Z. C. Lin, K. Tien, W.-G. Bae, H. Wang, P. Mei, H.-H. Chou, B. Cui, K. Deisseroth, T. N. Ng, Z. Bao, Science 2015, 350, 313.
- [8]8. K. E. Foley, Nat Med 2016, 22, 2.
- [9]9. H. P. Saal, S. J. Bensmaia, Neuropsychologia 2015, 79, 344.
- [10]10. C. Bartolozzi, L. Natale, F. Nori, G. Metta, Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 921.
- [11]11. B. Zhu, H. Wang, Y. Liu, D. Qi, Z. Liu, H. Wang, J. Yu, M. Sherburne, Z. Wang, X. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1559.
- [12]12. Y. Zang, H. Shen, D. Huang, C. A. Di, D. Zhu, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606088.
- [13]13. H. H. Chou, A. Nguyen, A. Chortos, J. W. To, C. Lu, J. Mei, T. Kurosawa, W. G. Bae, J. B. Tok, Z. Bao, Nat Commun 2015, 6, 8011.
- [14]14. R. A. Nawrocki, N. Matsuhisa, T. Yokota, T. Someya, Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1500452.
- [15]15. P. Langley, Machine Learning 2011, 82, 275.
- [16]16. M. I. Jordan, T. M. Mitchell, Science 2015, 349, 255.
- [17]17. Z. Wang, S. Joshi, S. E. Savel'ev, H. Jiang, R. Midya, P. Lin, M. Hu, N. Ge, J. P. Strachan, Z. Li, Q. Wu, M. Barnell, G.-L. Li, H. L. Xin, R. S. Williams, Q. Xia, J. J. Yang, Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 101.
- [18]18. P. Gkoupidenis, D. A. Koutsouras, G. G. Malliaras, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15448.
- [19]19. M. Lee, W. Lee, S. Choi, J. W. Jo, J. Kim, S. K. Park, Y. H. Kim, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700951.
- [20]20. C. H. Yang, B. Chen, J. J. Lu, J. H. Yang, J. Zhou, Y. M. Chen, Z. Suo, Extreme Mech. Lett. 2015, 3, 59.
- [21]21. S. Gong, W. Schwalb, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Tang, J. Si, B. Shirinzadeh, W. Cheng, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3132.
- [22]22. N. N. Jason, M. D. Ho, W. Cheng, J. Mater. Chem C 2017, 5, 5845.
- [23]23. K. K. Kim, S. Hong, H. M. Cho, J. Lee, Y. D. Suh, J. Ham, S. H. Ko, Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 5240.
- [24]24. C. Keplinger, J.-Y. Sun, C. C. Foo, P. Rothemund, G. M. Whitesides, Z. Suo, Science 2013, 341, 984.
- [25]25. C. H. Yang, B. Chen, J. Zhou, Y. M. Chen, Z. Suo, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4480.
- [26]26. C. Zhao, C. Wang, Z. Yue, K. Shu, G. G. Wallace, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2013, 5, 9008.
- [27]27. Z. Niu, H. Dong, B. Zhu, J. Li, H. H. Hng, W. Zhou, X. Chen, S. Xie, Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1058.
- [28]28. K. S. Hemalatha, G. Sriprakash, M. V. N. A. Prasad, R. Damle, K. Rukmani, J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 154103.
- [29]29. C. Wan, L. Zhu, Y. Liu, Y. Shi, Q. Wan, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2014, 35, 672.
- [30]30. L. Q. Zhu, C. J. Wan, L. Q. Guo, Y. Shi, Q. Wan, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3158.
- [31]31. J. Jiang, J. Guo, X. Wan, Y. Yang, H. Xie, D. Niu, J. Yang, J. He, Y. Gao, Q. Wan, Small 2017, 13, 1700933.
- [32]32. W. Xie, X. Zhang, C. Leighton, C. D. Frisbie, Adv. Electron. Mater. 2017, 3, 1600369.
- [33]33. T. Chang, S. H. Jo, W. Lu, ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7669.
- [34]34. T. Ohno, T. Hasegawa, T. Tsuruoka, K. Terabe, J. K. Gimzewski, M. Aono, Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 591.
- [35]35. M. Lee, W. Lee, S. Choi, J. W. Jo, J. Kim, S. K. Park, Y. H. Kim, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700951.
- [36]36. P. Stoliar, J. Tranchant, B. Corraze, E. Janod, M. P. Besland, F. Tesler, M. Rozenberg, L. Cario, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1604740.
- [37]37. J. C. Magee, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2000, 1, 181.
- [38]38. A. Polsky, B. W. Mel, J. Schiller, Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 621.
- Authors
- Wan, C., Chen, G., Fu, Y., Wang, M., Matsuhisa, N., Pan, S., Pan, L., Yang, H., Wan, Q., Zhu, L., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Key Laboratory of Graphene Technologies and Applications of Zhejiang Province Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering Chinese Academy of Sciences Ningbo 315201 Zhejiang P. R. China
- Nanjing University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Xiaodong
- ORCID
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- e1801291-e1801291
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2806904536
- Semantic Scholar
- 463a9236fb0d587c2da24571db2c22519e5eb0a4
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2016NRF‐NRF1001‐21)
- Ministry of Education - Singapore (MOE2017‐T2‐2‐107)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Keywords
- resistive pressure sensors, synaptic transistors, ionic-electronic coupling, spatio-temporal pattern recognition, machine learning integration
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Sensory Receptor Cells, Robotics, Skin, Touch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review