Cited by 197Perovskite Materials and Applications2D Materials and ApplicationsQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding Detrimental and Beneficial Grain Boundary Effects in Halide Perovskites

Open access

Abstract

Grain boundaries play a key role in the performance of thin‐film optoelectronic devices and yet their effect in halide perovskite materials is still not understood. The biggest factor limiting progress is the inability to identify grain boundaries. Noncrystallographic techniques can misidentify grain boundaries, leading to conflicting literature reports about their influence; however, the gold standard – electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) – destroys halide perovskite thin films. Here, this problem is solved by using a solid‐state EBSD detector with 6000 times higher sensitivity than the traditional phosphor screen and camera. Correlating true grain size with photoluminescence lifetime, carrier diffusion length, and mobility shows that grain boundaries are not benign but have a recombination velocity of 1670 cm s−1, comparable to that of crystalline silicon. Amorphous grain boundaries are also observed that give rise to locally brighter photoluminescence intensity and longer lifetimes. This anomalous grain boundary character offers a possible explanation for the mysteriously long lifetime and record efficiency achieved in small grain halide perovskite thin films. It also suggests a new approach for passivating grain boundaries, independent of surface passivation, to lead to even better performance in optoelectronic devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201804792

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 10.1063/1.4864778 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/anie.201409740 · DOI
  3. 10.1039/C7EE00303J · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nmat3911 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00239 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.aaa2725 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00182 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.81 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00288 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/adma.201504144 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00466 · DOI
  12. 10.1039/C6CP08770A · DOI
  13. Fisher D., 2016, IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conf. (PVSC), 0768
  14. 10.1039/C5NR08935B · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.aaa0472 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/jz501510v · DOI
  17. 10.1021/jacs.6b06320 · DOI
  18. 10.1021/nl501838y · DOI
  19. 10.1021/acsnano.6b05825 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.93 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02011 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00050 · DOI
  23. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00455 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/jacs.5b10599 · DOI
  25. 10.1039/C6NR00488A · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.110 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.nima.2007.08.079 · DOI
  28. 10.1063/1.1708749 · DOI
  29. 10.1021/nl403514x · DOI
  30. 10.1023/A:1008733728830 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRev.78.275 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00062-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s11661-006-0148-1 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/pssr.200701137 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/aenm.201400454 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.09.008 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/nl802433u · DOI
  38. 10.1063/1.4907534 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acsnano.7b00017 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/ncomms14547 · DOI
  41. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2540246 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2312485 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/pip.1008 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/pip.2437 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.054 · DOI
  46. 10.1063/1.2435815 · DOI
  47. 10.1063/1.3544208 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/acsnano.7b06242 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/ange.201606574 · DOI
  50. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01185 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/pip.2889 · DOI
  52. 10.1063/1.97548 · DOI
  53. 10.1063/1.100051 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0379-6787(83)90061-3 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0927-0248(94)90257-7 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/0379-6787(90)90040-C · DOI
  57. 10.1063/1.357521 · DOI
  58. 10.1063/1.326334 · DOI
  59. 10.1109/16.43821 · DOI
  60. 10.1063/1.369726 · DOI
  61. Sze S. M., 2007, Physics of Semiconductor Devices
  62. Shockley W., 1950, Electron and Holes in Semiconductors
  63. 10.1038/ncomms8961 · DOI
  64. 10.1063/1.3486482 · DOI
  65. 10.1063/1.333161 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/solr.201600014 · DOI
  67. Gloeckler M., 2005, Appl. Phys. Lett., 98, 113704
  68. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.050 · DOI
  69. 10.1021/jp512936z · DOI
  70. 10.1038/s41566-018-0154-z · DOI
  71. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.006 · DOI
  72. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00236 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.207 · DOI
  74. 10.1038/nnano.2016.30 · DOI
  75. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01092 · DOI
  76. Silverman B. W., 1982, J. R. Stat. Soc., 31, 93
  77. 10.1038/ncomms13941 · DOI
  78. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02290 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adhyaksa, G. W. P., Brittman, S., Āboliņš, H., Lof, A., Li, X., Keelor, J. D., Luo, Y., Duevski, T., Heeren, R. M. A., Ellis, S. R., Fenning, D. P., & Garnett, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (NL)
  • United States Naval Research Laboratory (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Garnett, Erik C.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-26
Volume
30
Issue
52
Pages
e1804792-e1804792
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2898573422
Cited by
197
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • AMOLF Institutional Repository (AMOLF) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hellman Foundation
  • California Energy Commission (EPC‐16‐050)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐AC02‐06CH11357)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • European Research Council (FP/2007‐ 2013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Perovskite Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Keywords
halide perovskites, grain boundaries, grain boundary recombination, electron backscatter diffraction, grain size, photoluminescence lifetime, carrier diffusion length, carrier mobility, amorphous grain boundaries, grain boundary passivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review