The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restricting Lattice Flexibility in Polycrystalline Metal–Organic Framework Membranes for Carbon Capture
Abstract
Although polycrystalline metal‐organic framework (MOF) membranes offer several advantages over other nanoporous membranes, thus far they have not yielded good CO 2 separation performance, crucial for energy‐efficient carbon capture. ZIF‐8, one of the most popular MOFs, has a crystallographically determined pore aperture of 0.34 nm, ideal for CO 2/N 2 and CO 2/CH 4 separation; however, its flexible lattice restricts the corresponding separation selectivities to below 5. A novel postsynthetic rapid heat treatment (RHT), implemented in a few seconds at 360 °C, which drastically improves the carbon capture performance of the ZIF‐8 membranes, is reported. Lattice stiffening is confirmed by the appearance of a temperature‐activated transport, attributed to a stronger interaction of gas molecules with the pore aperture, with activation energy increasing with the molecular size (CH 4 > CO 2 > H 2). Unprecedented CO 2/CH 4, CO 2/N 2, and H 2/CH 4 selectivities exceeding 30, 30, and 175, respectively, and complete blockage of C 3 H 6, are achieved. Spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction studies confirm that while the coordination environment and crystallinity are unaffected, lattice distortion and strain are incorporated in the ZIF‐8 lattice, increasing the lattice stiffness. Overall, RHT treatment is a facile and versatile technique that can vastly improve the gas‐separation performance of the MOF membranes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges
Gao, W., Liang, S., Wang, R., Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Q., Xie, B., Toe, C. Y., Zhu, X., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00025f · Cited by 1,388
Advances in metal–organic framework-based membranes
Cheng, Y., Datta, S. J., Zhou, S., Jia, J., Shekhah, O., & Eddaoudi, M. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00031h · Cited by 423
Microporous framework membranes for precise molecule/ion separations
Dou, H., Xu, M., Wang, B., Zhang, Z., Wen, G., Zheng, Y., Luo, D., Zhao, L., Yu, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00552e · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Babu, D. J., He, G., Hao, J., Vahdat, M. T., Schouwink, P. A., Mensi, M., & Agrawal, K. V.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-14
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- e1900855-e1900855
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2945245581
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restricting Lattice Flexibility in Polycrystalline Metal–Organic Framework Membranes for Carbon Capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201900855
- The paper
- Babu, D. J., He, G., Hao, J., Vahdat, M. T., Schouwink, P. A., Mensi, M., & Agrawal, K. V. (2019). Restricting Lattice Flexibility in Polycrystalline Metal–Organic Framework Membranes for Carbon Capture. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201900855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.