Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 586

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

17% Efficient Organic Solar Cells Based on Liquid Exfoliated WS2 as a Replacement for PEDOT:PSS

Lin, Yuanbao, Adilbekova, Begimai, Firdaus, Yuliar, Yengel, Emre, Faber, Hendrik, Sajjad, Muhammad, Zheng, Xiaopeng, Yarali, Emre, Seitkhan, Akmaral, Bakr, Osman M., El‐Labban, Abdulrahman, Schwingenschlögl, Udo, Tung, Vincent, McCulloch, Iain, Laquai, Frédéric, Anthopoulos, Thomas D.·2019·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The application of liquid‐exfoliated 2D transition metal disulfides (TMDs) as the hole transport layers (HTLs) in nonfullerene‐based organic solar cells is reported. It is shown that solution processing of few‐layer WS 2 or MoS 2 suspensions directly onto transparent indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes changes their work function without the need for any further treatment. HTLs comprising WS 2 are found to exhibit higher uniformity on ITO than those of MoS 2 and consistently yield solar cells with superior power conversion efficiency (PCE), improved fill factor (FF), enhanced short‐circuit current (JSC), and lower series resistance than devices based on poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) and MoS 2. Cells based on the ternary bulk‐heterojunction PBDB‐T‐2F:Y6:PC 71 BM with WS 2 as the HTL exhibit the highest PCE of 17%, with an FF of 78%, open‐circuit voltage of 0.84 V, and a JSC of 26 mA cm−2. Analysis of the cells' optical and carrier recombination characteristics indicates that the enhanced performance is most likely attributed to a combination of favorable photonic structure and reduced bimolecular recombination losses in WS 2‐based cells. The achieved PCE is the highest reported to date for organic solar cells comprised of 2D charge transport interlayers and highlights the potential of TMDs as inexpensive HTLs for high‐efficiency organic photovoltaics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201902965

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 586

Metadata

Authors
Lin, Y., Adilbekova, B., Firdaus, Y., Yengel, E., Faber, H., Sajjad, M., Zheng, X., Yarali, E., Seitkhan, A., Bakr, O. M., El‐Labban, A., Schwingenschlögl, U., Tung, V., McCulloch, I., Laquai, F., & Anthopoulos, T. D.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
31
Issue
46
Pages
e1902965-e1902965
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2978340922
Cited by
586
References
40
FWCI
39.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 17% Efficient Organic Solar Cells Based on Liquid Exfoliated WS2 as a Replacement for PEDOT:PSS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201902965
The paper
Lin, Y., Adilbekova, B., Firdaus, Y., Yengel, E., Faber, H., Sajjad, M., Zheng, X., Yarali, E., Seitkhan, A., Bakr, O. M., El‐Labban, A., Schwingenschlögl, U., Tung, V., McCulloch, I., Laquai, F., & Anthopoulos, T. D. (2019). 17% Efficient Organic Solar Cells Based on Liquid Exfoliated WS2 as a Replacement for PEDOT:PSS. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902965

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.