The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Emerging Potassium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
This is the first review on potassium–sulfur (K–S) batteries (KSBs), which are emerging metal battery (MB) systems. Since KSBs are quite new, there are fundamental questions regarding the electrochemistry of S‐based cathode and of K metal anode, as well as the holistic aspects of full‐cell performance. The manuscript begins with a critical discussion regarding the potassium–sulfur electrochemistry and on how it differs from the much better‐known lithium–sulfur. Cathodes are discussed next, focusing on the role of sulfur structure, carbon host chemistry and porosity, and electrolytes in establishing the reversible potassium sulfide K 2 Sn phase sequence, the parasitic polysulfide shuttle, pulverization‐driven capacity fade, etc. Following is a discussion of solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs), including of hybrid solid–liquid systems that show much promise. Potassium metal anodes are then critically reviewed, emphasizing electrolyte reactions to form stable versus unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), covering the current understanding of potassium dendrites, and highlighting the deep‐eutectic K–Na alloying approaches for room temperature liquid anodes. The manuscript concludes with K–S batteries, focusing on cell architectures and providing quantitative performance comparisons as master plots. Unanswered scientific/technological questions are identified, emerging research opportunities are discussed, and potential experimental and simulation‐based studies that can unravel these unknowns are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer
Kunitski, M., Eicke, N., Huber, P., Köhler, J., Zeller, S., Voigtsberger, J., Schlott, N., Henrichs, K., Sann, H., Trinter, F., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8 · Cited by 8,162
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
High rate and stable cycling of lithium metal anode
Qian, J., Henderson, W. A., Xu, W., Bhattacharya, P., Engelhard, M., Borodin, O., & Zhang, J.-G. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7362 · Cited by 2,561
Electrochemical in situ investigations of SEI and dendrite formation on the lithium metal anode
Bieker, G., Winter, M., & Bieker, P. (2015) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c4cp05865h · Cited by 777
Cited by
Liquid metal batteries for future energy storage
Zhang, S., Liu, Y., Fan, Q., Zhang, C., Zhou, T., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., & Guo, Z. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00531f · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, J., Zhang, H., Fan, W., Zhong, C., Hu, W., & Mitlin, D.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-04-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- e1908007-e1908007
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W3014468613
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Emerging Potassium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201908007
- The paper
- Ding, J., Zhang, H., Fan, W., Zhong, C., Hu, W., & Mitlin, D. (2020). Review of Emerging Potassium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201908007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.