Electronically and Geometrically Modified Single‐Atom Fe Sites by Adjacent Fe Nanoparticles for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction
Abstract
Fe–N–C materials exhibit excellent activity and stability for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), as one of the most promising candidates to replace commercial Pt/C catalysts. However, it is challenging to unravel features of the superior ORR activity originating from Fe–N–C materials. In this work, the electronic and geometric structures of the isolated Fe–N–C sites and their correlations with the ORR performance are investigated by varying the secondary thermal activation temperature of a rationally designed NC‐supported Fe single‐atom catalyst (SAC). The systematic analyses demonstrate the significant role of coordinated atoms of SA and metallic Fe nanoparticles (NPs) in altering the electronic structure of isolated Fe–N–C sites. Meanwhile, strong interaction between isolated Fe–N–C sites and adjacent Fe NPs can change the geometric structure of isolated Fe–N–C sites. Theoretical calculations reveal that optimal regulation of the electronic and geometric structure of isolated Fe–N–C sites by the co‐existence of Fe NPs narrows the energy barriers of the rate‐limiting steps of ORR, resulting in outstanding ORR performance. This work not only provides the fundamental understanding of the underlying structure–activity relationship, but also sheds light on designing efficient Fe–N–C catalysts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite improved ORR activity, the instability issue of PGM-free catalysts has been specifically highlighted in recent years.
“Despite the improved ORR activity, the instability issue of PGM-free catalysts has been specifically highlighted in recent years [58,59].”
From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [58]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly
Mo, S., Du, L., Huang, Z., Chen, J., Zhou, Y., Wu, P., Meng, L., Wang, N., Xing, L., Zhao, M., et al. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00190-w · Cited by 277 · see citing works
“Despite the improved ORR activity, the instability issue of PGM-free catalysts has been specifically highlighted in recent years [58, 59].”
- Authors
- Zhao, S., Li, J., Wang, R., Cai, J., & Zang, S.
- Affiliations
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zang, Shuang‐Quan
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-12-16
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e2107291-e2107291
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W3213757777
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 35
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (92061201, 21825106, 22105175)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Keywords
- oxygen reduction reaction, Fe-N-C catalysts, single-atom catalysts, iron nanoparticles, electronic structure, geometric structure, structure-activity relationship, rate-determining step, non-precious metal electrocatalysts, Pt/C alternative
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review