Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strong‐Proton‐Adsorption Co‐Based Electrocatalysts Achieve Active and Stable Neutral Seawater Splitting

Open access
Wang, Ning, Ou, Pengfei, Hung, Sung‐Fu, Huang, Jianan Erick, Ozden, Adnan, Abed, Jehad, Grigioni, Ivan, Chen, Clark, Miao, Rui Kai, Yan, Yu, Zhang, Jinqiang, Wang, Ziyun, Dorakhan, Roham, Badreldin, Ahmed, Abdel‐Wahab, Ahmed, Sinton, David, Liu, Yongchang, Liang, Hongyan, Sargent, Edward H.·2023·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Direct electrolysis of pH‐neutral seawater to generate hydrogen is an attractive approach for storing renewable energy. However, due to the anodic competition between the chlorine evolution and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), direct seawater splitting suffers from a low current density and limited operating stability. Exploration of catalysts enabling an OER overpotential below the hypochlorite formation overpotential (≈490 mV) is critical to suppress the chloride evolution and facilitate seawater splitting. Here, a proton‐adsorption‐promoting strategy to increase the OER rate is reported, resulting in a promoted and more stable neutral seawater splitting. The best catalysts herein are strong‐proton‐adsorption (SPA) materials such as palladium‐doped cobalt oxide (Co 3–xPdxO 4) catalysts. These achieve an OER overpotential of 370 mV at 10 mA cm−2 in pH‐neutral simulated seawater, outperforming Co 3 O 4 by a margin of 70 mV. Co 3–xPdxO 4 catalysts provide stable catalytic performance for 450 h at 200 mA cm−2 and 20 h at 1 A cm−2 in neutral seawater. Experimental studies and theoretical calculations suggest that the incorporation of SPA cations accelerates the rate‐determining water dissociation step in neutral OER pathway, and control studies rule out the provision of additional OER sites as a main factor herein.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202210057

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Wang, N., Ou, P., Hung, S., Huang, J. E., Ozden, A., Abed, J., Grigioni, I., Chen, C., Miao, R. K., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Dorakhan, R., Badreldin, A., Abdel‐Wahab, A., Sinton, D., Liu, Y., Liang, H., & Sargent, E. H.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-03-15
Volume
35
Issue
16
Pages
e2210057-e2210057
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4318618953
Cited by
198
References
5
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong‐Proton‐Adsorption Co‐Based Electrocatalysts Achieve Active and Stable Neutral Seawater Splitting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202210057
The paper
Wang, N., Ou, P., Hung, S., Huang, J. E., Ozden, A., Abed, J., Grigioni, I., Chen, C., Miao, R. K., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Dorakhan, R., Badreldin, A., Abdel‐Wahab, A., Sinton, D., Liu, Y., Liang, H., & Sargent, E. H. (2023). Strong‐Proton‐Adsorption Co‐Based Electrocatalysts Achieve Active and Stable Neutral Seawater Splitting. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202210057

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.