Cited by 176Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion2D Materials and ApplicationsCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Exfoliated 2D Transition Metal Disulfides for Enhanced Electrocatalysis of Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Acidic Medium

Wu, Jingjie, Liu, Mingjie, Chatterjee, Kuntal, Hackenberg, Ken P., Shen, Jianfeng, Zou, Xiaolong, Yan, Yong, Gu, Jing +3 more·2016·Advanced Materials Interfaces

Abstract

The scarcity of inexpensive and efficient electrocatalyst for acid water oxidation to molecular oxygen presents the development of nonprecious catalysts for water oxidation a scientific priority. For water splitting, transition‐metal dichalcogenides have attracted great interest as advanced catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction, but there has been no sincere attention to generate significant anodic current density of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) with these materials. Addressing this unmet need, here, the outstanding catalytic performance of MoS2 and TaS2 in OER is demonstrated. Chemically exfoliated 2D thin sheets of MoS2 and TaS2, in both of their 1T and 2H polymorph, have been employed for OER catalysis in acid medium. The best performance for oxygen evolution, which is also comparable to benchmark IrO2, comes out from 1T‐MoS2 followed by 1T‐TaS2, 2H‐MoS2, and 2H‐TaS2. Theoretical study reveals that the dominant catalytic activity is on edge sites instead of surface and corroborates the experimental results of polymorphic dependence of electrocatalytic activity. The materials have also shown moderate durability in the harsh acidic medium. The study brings up new set of electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution in acid regime that hitherto has remained largely unrevealed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/admi.201500669

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J., Liu, M., Chatterjee, K., Hackenberg, K. P., Shen, J., Zou, X., Yan, Y., Gu, J., Yang, Y., Lou, J., & Ajayan, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • Vidyasagar University (IN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chatterjee, Kuntal
  • Lou, Jun
Venue
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
3
Issue
9
ISSN
2196-7350 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2301830619
Cited by
176
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Materials Interfaces (publishedVersion)
Funders
US Air Force Office of Scientific Research BRI (FA9550-14-1-0268)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
oxygen evolution reaction, transition metal disulfides, MoS2, TaS2, two-dimensional materials, chemical exfoliation, acidic media, edge sites, water oxidation, catalyst stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review