Cited by 740Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion2D Materials and ApplicationsCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies

Layer-Dependent Electrocatalysis of MoS2 for Hydrogen Evolution

Open access
Yu, Yifei, Huang, Sheng-Yang, Li, Yanpeng, Steinmann, Stephan N., Yang, Weitao, Cao, Linyou·2014·Nano Letters

Abstract

The quantitative correlation of the catalytic activity with the microscopic structure of heterogeneous catalysts is a major challenge for the field of catalysis science. It requests synergistic capabilities to tailor the structure with atomic scale precision and to control the catalytic reaction to proceed through well-defined pathways. Here we leverage on the controlled growth of MoS2 atomically thin films to demonstrate that the catalytic activity of MoS2 for the hydrogen evolution reaction decreases by a factor of ∼ 4.47 for the addition of every one more layer. Similar layer dependence is also found in edge-riched MoS2 pyramid platelets. This layer-dependent electrocatalysis can be correlated to the hopping of electrons in the vertical direction of MoS2 layers over an interlayer potential barrier. Our experimental results suggest the potential barrier to be 0.119 V, consistent with theoretical calculations. Different from the conventional wisdom, which states that the number of edge sites is important, our results suggest that increasing the hopping efficiency of electrons in the vertical direction is a key for the development of high-efficiency two-dimensional material catalysts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl403620g

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]24. Cappelluti, E., Roldan, R., Silva-Guillen, J.A., Ordejon, P. & Guinea, F. Tight-binding model and direct-gap/indirect-gap transition in single-layer and multi-layer MoS2. arXiv: 1304.4831 (2013). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Huang, S.-Y., Li, Y., Steinmann, S. N., Yang, W., & Cao, L.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Cao, Linyou
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2014-01-16
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
553-558
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W1981702910
Cited by
740
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 90 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 33
FWCI
30.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Keywords
MoS2, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, two-dimensional materials, electron hopping, edge sites, atomically thin films, structure-activity relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review