Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Self‐Healing Concrete for Damage Management of Structures

Open access
De Belie, Nele, Gruyaert, Elke, Al‐Tabbaa, Abir, Antonaci, Paola, Baera, Cornelia, Bajare, Diana, Darquennes, Aveline, Davies, Robert, Ferrara, Liberato, Jefferson, Tony, Litina, Chrysoula, Miljevic, Bojan, Otlewska, Anna, Ranogajec, Jonjaua, Roig‐Flores, Marta, Paine, Kevin, Lukowski, Pawel, Serna, Pedro, Tulliani, Jean‐Marc, Vucetic, Snezana, Wang, Jianyun, Jonkers, Henk M.·2018·Advanced Materials Interfaces

Abstract

The increasing concern for safety and sustainability of structures is calling for the development of smart self‐healing materials and preventive repair methods. The appearance of small cracks (<300 µm in width) in concrete is almost unavoidable, not necessarily causing a risk of collapse for the structure, but surely impairing its functionality, accelerating its degradation, and diminishing its service life and sustainability. This review provides the state‐of‐the‐art of recent developments of self‐healing concrete, covering autogenous or intrinsic healing of traditional concrete followed by stimulated autogenous healing via use of mineral additives, crystalline admixtures or (superabsorbent) polymers, and subsequently autonomous self‐healing mechanisms, i.e. via, application of micro‐, macro‐, or vascular encapsulated polymers, minerals, or bacteria. The (stimulated) autogenous mechanisms are generally limited to healing crack widths of about 100–150 µm. In contrast, most autonomous self‐healing mechanisms can heal cracks of 300 µm, even sometimes up to more than 1 mm, and usually act faster. After explaining the basic concept for each self‐healing technique, the most recent advances are collected, explaining the progress and current limitations, to provide insights toward the future developments. This review addresses the research needs required to remove hindrances that limit market penetration of self‐healing concrete technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/admi.201800074

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 96 references

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
De Belie, N., Gruyaert, E., Al‐Tabbaa, A., Antonaci, P., Baera, C., Bajare, D., Darquennes, A., Davies, R., Ferrara, L., Jefferson, T., Litina, C., Miljevic, B., Otlewska, A., Ranogajec, J., Roig‐Flores, M., Paine, K., Lukowski, P., Serna, P., Tulliani, J., Vucetic, S., Wang, J., & Jonkers, H. M.
Venue
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-05-16
Volume
5
Issue
17
ISSN
2196-7350 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804514877
Cited by
774
References
96
FWCI
23.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Self‐Healing Concrete for Damage Management of Structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/admi.201800074
The paper
De Belie, N., Gruyaert, E., Al‐Tabbaa, A., Antonaci, P., Baera, C., Bajare, D., Darquennes, A., Davies, R., Ferrara, L., Jefferson, T., Litina, C., Miljevic, B., Otlewska, A., Ranogajec, J., Roig‐Flores, M., Paine, K., Lukowski, P., Serna, P., Tulliani, J., . . . Jonkers, H. M. (2018). A Review of Self‐Healing Concrete for Damage Management of Structures. Advanced Materials Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201800074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.