The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enantioselective Hydrogenation Using Heterogeneous Modified Catalysts: An Update
Abstract
The state of the art for the enantioselective hydrogenation applying chirally modified heterogeneous catalysts is reviewed with emphasis on new developments between 1997 and 2002. Discussed are various combinations of metal–modifier–substrate which give enantioselectivities useful for synthetic applications. The three most important asymmetric catalysts types are nickel catalysts modified with tartaric acid, useful for β‐functionalized ketones with ees up to 98.6%, platinum catalysts modified with cinchona alkaloids and related modifiers, successful for α‐functionalized ketones with ees up to 98% and palladium catalysts modified with cinchona alkaloids which achieve ees up to 94% for selected activated CC bonds. Mechanistic investigations comprising surface science and spectroscopic studies often combined with computational modeling as well as kinetic studies are summarized and the various mechanistic models are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chirality in adsorption on solid surfaces
Zaera, F. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00367f · Cited by 172
Synthesis of Co Nanoparticles by Pulsed Laser Irradiation of Cobalt Carbonyl in Organic Solution
Robinson, I., Volk, M., Tung, L. D., Caruntu, G., Kay, N., & Thanh, N. T. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp9014564 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Studer, M., Blaser, H., & Exner, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 45-65
- ISSN
- 1615-4150 (ISSN-L)
- 1615-4169
- OpenAlex
- W2120634307
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.