Cited by 9Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChemical Synthesis and AnalysisNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiparameter Peptide Optimization toward Stable Triple Agonists for the Treatment of Diabetes and Obesity

Evers, Andreas, Pfeiffer‐Marek, Stefania, Bossart, Martin, Elvert, Ralf, Lorenz, Katrin, Heubel, Christoph, Garea, Ana Villar, Schroeter, Katrin, Riedel, Jens, Stock, Ursula, Konkar, Anish, Wagner, Michael·2020·Advanced Therapeutics

Abstract

Historically, peptide optimization has mainly focused on pharmacological activity. Physicochemical properties have often been evaluated late in discovery, potentially providing molecules with suboptimal stability properties. Often, such issues cannot be overcome by formulation approaches but need additional optimization cycles for a redesign of the peptide. Here, early rational multiparameter optimization of exendin‐4 based agonists is described toward i) a balanced triple activity profile at the glucagon‐like peptide 1, glucagon, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptors for the treatment of diabetes and obesity and in parallel ii) robust physicochemical properties for 1‐daily subcutaneous application in a multiple‐dose pen device. In depth evaluation of an optimized candidate shows an excellent profile with respect to its physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PD) behavior in minipigs and monkeys.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adtp.202000052

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unimolecular triple agonists with time-action appropriate for once-daily clinical administration demonstrate the metabolic benefits of the three combined activities in preclinical settings.

    “In support of this notion, unimolecular triple agonists with time-action appropriate for once-daily clinical administration demonstrate the metabolic benefits of the three combined activities in preclinical settings [43,46]”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1080/10606820213687 · DOI
  2. Choi I. Y., 2018, Diabetes, 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evers, A., Pfeiffer‐Marek, S., Bossart, M., Elvert, R., Lorenz, K., Heubel, C., Garea, A. V., Schroeter, K., Riedel, J., Stock, U., Konkar, A., & Wagner, M.
Affiliations
  • Sanofi (Germany) (DE)
  • R&D, Sanofi‐Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Industriepark Höchst Frankfurt am Main D‐65926 Germany
Corresponding author
  • Evers, Andreas
  • Wagner, Michael
Venue
Advanced Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-11
Volume
3
Issue
9
ISSN
2366-3987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034475447
Cited by
9
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
peptide optimization, GLP-1 receptor, glucagon receptor, GIP receptor, diabetes treatment, obesity treatment, physicochemical stability, subcutaneous administration, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, minipigs, monkeys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review