The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photoluminescent Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Sensing
Open accessAbstract
Luminescence of porous coordination polymers (PCPs) or metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) is sensitive to the type and concentration of chemical species in the surrounding environment, because these materials combine the advantages of the highly regular porous structures and various luminescence mechanisms, as well as diversified host‐guest interactions. In the past few years, luminescent MOFs have attracted more and more attention for chemical sensing of gas‐phase analytes, including common gases and vapors of solids/liquids. While liquid‐phase and gas‐phase luminescence sensing by MOFs share similar mechanisms such as host‐guest electron and/or energy transfer, exiplex formation, and guest‐perturbing of excited‐state energy level and radiation pathways, via various types of host‐guest interactions, gas‐phase sensing has its unique advantages and challenges, such as easy utilization of encapsulated guest luminophores and difficulty for accurate measurement of the intensity change. This review summarizes recent progresses by using luminescent MOFs as reusable sensing materials for detection of gases and vapors of solids/liquids especially for O 2, highlighting various strategies for improving the sensitivity, selectivity, stability, and accuracy, reducing the materials cost, and developing related devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Physical Mechanisms of Generation and Deactivation of Singlet Oxygen
Schweitzer, C., & Schmidt, R. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010371d · Cited by 2,123
Cited by
Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: Status and challenges
Li, H., Li, L., Lin, R.-B., Zhou, W., Zhang, Z., Xiang, S., & Chen, B. (2019) · EnergyChem · doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100006 · Cited by 891
Self-citationZhu, L., Zong, L., Wu, X., Li, M., Wang, H., You, J., & Li, C. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b00566 · Cited by 455
Recent advances in guest effects on spin-crossover behavior in Hofmann-type metal-organic frameworks
Ni, Z.-P., Liu, J.-L., Hoque, M. N., Liu, W., Li, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Tong, M.-L. (2017) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2016.12.002 · Cited by 448
Detection and removal of antibiotic tetracycline in water with a highly stable luminescent MOF
Zhou, Y., Yang, Q., Zhang, D., Gan, N., Li, Q., & Cuan, J. (2018) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2018.01.218 · Cited by 331
Hydrophobic Metal–Organic Frameworks: Assessment, Construction, and Diverse Applications
Xie, L., Xu, M., Liu, X., Zhao, M., & Li, J. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201901758 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, R., Liu, S., Ye, J., Li, X., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1500434-1500434
- ISSN
- 2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2297187276
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photoluminescent Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/advs.201500434
- The paper
- Lin, R., Liu, S., Ye, J., Li, X., & Zhang, J. (2016). Photoluminescent Metal–Organic Frameworks for Gas Sensing. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201500434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.