The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Interface Charge Transfer and Redistribution in CuO‐CoOOH p‐n Heterojunction Nanoarray Electrocatalyst for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Open accessAbstract
Electron density modulation is of great importance in an attempt to achieve highly active electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Here, the successful construction of CuO@CoOOH p‐n heterojunction (i.e., p‐type CuO and n‐type CoOOH) nanoarray electrocatalyst through an in situ anodic oxidation of CuO@CoSx on copper foam is reported. The p‐n heterojunction can remarkably modify the electronic properties of the space‐charge region and facilitate the electron transfer. Moreover, in situ Raman study reveals the generation of SO 42− from CoSx oxidation, and electron cloud density distribution and density functional theory calculation suggest that surface‐adsorbed SO 42− can facilitate the OER process by enhancing the adsorption of OH−. The positively charged CoOOH in the space‐charge region can significantly enhance the OER activity. As a result, the CuO@CoOOH p‐n heterojunction shows significantly enhanced OER performance with a low overpotential of 186 mV to afford a current density of 10 mA cm−2. The successful preparation of a large scale (14 × 25 cm 2) sample demonstrates the possibility of promoting the catalyst to industrial‐scale production. This study offers new insights into the design and fabrication of non‐noble metal‐based p‐n heterojunction electrocatalysts as effective catalytic materials for energy storage and conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design
Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I., Nørskov, J. K., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4998 · Cited by 12,114
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
Guan, D., Zhou, J., Huang, Y.-C., Dong, C.-L., Wang, J.-Q., Zhou, W., & Shao, Z. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11847-w · Cited by 206
Self-citationWang, H., Feng, E.-M., Liu, Y.-M., & Zhang, C.-Y. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c9ta00878k · Cited by 98
Cited by
Qiang, S., Li, Z., He, S., Zhou, H., Zhang, Y., Cao, X., Yuan, A., Zou, J., Wu, J., & Qiao, Y. (2025) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110564 · Cited by 174
Self-citationZhang, Y., Ma, D., Lei, Y., Zhu, T., Hu, J., Tang, Y., Chen, Z., Huang, J., Lai, Y., & Lin, Z. (2023) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108896 · Cited by 54
Self-citationChen, X., Yan, S., Wen, S., Chen, J., Xu, J., Wang, C., & Lu, X. (2023) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.03.097 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, J., Al‐Salihy, A., Wang, J., Li, X., Fu, Y., Li, Z., Han, X., Song, B., & Xu, P.
- Venue
- Advanced Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-10-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- e2103314-e2103314
- ISSN
- 2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3205198364
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Interface Charge Transfer and Redistribution in CuO‐CoOOH p‐n Heterojunction Nanoarray Electrocatalyst for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/advs.202103314
- The paper
- Hu, J., Al‐Salihy, A., Wang, J., Li, X., Fu, Y., Li, Z., Han, X., Song, B., & Xu, P. (2021). Improved Interface Charge Transfer and Redistribution in CuO‐CoOOH p‐n Heterojunction Nanoarray Electrocatalyst for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202103314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.