Cited by 68Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Monitoring EPR Effect Dynamics during Nanotaxane Treatment with Theranostic Polymeric Micelles

Open access
Biancacci, Ilaria, De Lorenzi, Federica, Theek, Benjamin, Bai, Xiangyang, May, Jan‐Niklas, Consolino, Lorena, Baues, Maike, Moeckel, Diana +15 more·2022·Advanced Science

Abstract

Abstract Cancer nanomedicines rely on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for efficient target site accumulation. The EPR effect, however, is highly heterogeneous among different tumor types and cancer patients and its extent is expected to dynamically change during the course of nanochemotherapy. Here the authors set out to longitudinally study the dynamics of the EPR effect upon single‐ and double‐dose nanotherapy with fluorophore‐labeled and paclitaxel‐loaded polymeric micelles. Using computed tomography‐fluorescence molecular tomography imaging, it is shown that the extent of nanomedicine tumor accumulation is predictive for therapy outcome. It is also shown that the interindividual heterogeneity in EPR‐based tumor accumulation significantly increases during treatment, especially for more efficient double‐dose nanotaxane therapy. Furthermore, for double‐dose micelle therapy, tumor accumulation significantly increased over time, from 7% injected dose per gram (ID g–1) upon the first administration to 15% ID g–1 upon the fifth administration, contributing to more efficient inhibition of tumor growth. These findings shed light on the dynamics of the EPR effect during nanomedicine treatment and they exemplify the importance of using imaging in nanomedicine treatment prediction and clinical translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/advs.202103745

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For dual dose treatment, tumor aggregation was enhanced over time, from 7% injected dose per gram upon the first administration to 15% injected dose per gram upon the fifth administration, contributing to efficient tumor growth inhibition.

    “Further, for dual dose treatment, tumor aggregation was enhanced over time, from 7% injected dose per gram upon the first administration to 15% injected dose per gram upon the fifth administration, contributing to efficient tumor growth inhibition.”

    From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Results and Discussion report that, in the 30 mg kg⁻¹ group, accumulation per labeled injection rose from 7.2 to 14.7% ID g⁻¹; the third labeled injection was the fifth injection overall. The same section reports significant tumor-growth inhibition at that dose, but says improved tumor targeting only *seems* able to influence treatment outcomes. The claim presents that contribution more definitively than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cancer nanodrugs rely on the EPR effect for effective accumulation into the target site.

    “Cancer nanodrugs rely on the EPR effect for effective accumulation into the target site [2].”
  • The result demonstrated aggregation of micelles in tumors.

    “The result demonstrated aggregation of micelles in tumors.”
  • Disproportionally more tumor accumulation was observed for double dose than single dose with an enhanced therapeutic effect.

    “Disproportionally more tumor accumulation was observed for double dose than single dose with an enhanced therapeutic effect.”
  • Cy7-labeled and paclitaxel-loaded micelles were fabricated to longitudinally represent and enumerate nanomedicine tumor aggregation during nanotaxane therapy of 4T1 murine TNBC tumors.

    “Cy7-labeled and paclitaxel-loaded micelles were fabricated to longitudinally represent and enumerate nanomedicine tumor aggregation during nanotaxane therapy of 4T1 murine TNBC tumors.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 68

Authors
Biancacci, I., De Lorenzi, F., Theek, B., Bai, X., May, J., Consolino, L., Baues, M., Moeckel, D., Gremse, F., von Stillfried, S., El Shafei, A., Benderski, K., Azadkhah Shalmani, A., Wang, A., Momoh, J., Peña, Q., Buhl, E. M., Buyel, J., Hennink, W., Kiessling, F., Metselaar, J., Shi, Y., & Lammers, T.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
  • Department of Nanomedicine and Theranostics Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging RWTH Aachen University Clinic Aachen 52074 Germany
  • Institute of Pathology Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University Clinic Aachen 52074 Germany
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Yang
  • Lammers, Twan
Venue
Advanced Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-24
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
e2103745-e2103745
ISSN
2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4207051665
Cited by
68
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 2375, 331065168, SFB 1382, 403224013, SFB 1066, LA2937/4‐1, SH1223/1‐1)
  • European Commission (EFRE‐0801767)
  • European Research Council (864121)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
enhanced permeability and retention effect, polymeric micelles, paclitaxel, theranostics, individual heterogeneity, tumor growth inhibition, treatment outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Theranostic Nanomedicine, Humans, Micelles, Permeability, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review