The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Supramolecular “Double‐Cable” Structure with a 12944 Helix in a Columnar Porphyrin‐C60 Dyad and its Application in Polymer Solar Cells
Abstract
A novel porphyrin‐C60 dyad (PCD1) is designed and synthesized to investigate and manipulate the supramolecular structure where geometrically isotropic [such as [60]fullerene (C60)] and anisotropic [such as porphyrin (Por)] units coexist. It is observed that PCD1 possesses an enantiomeric phase behavior. The melting temperature of the stable PCD1 thermotropic phase is 160 °C with a latent heat (ΔH) of 18.5 kJ mol−1. The phase formation is majorly driven by the cooperative intermolecular Por–Por and C60–C60 interactions. Structural analysis reveals that this stable phase possesses a supramolecular “double‐cable” structure with one p‐type Por core columnar channel and three helical n‐type C60 peripheral channels. These “double‐cable” columns further pack into a hexagonal lattice with a = b = 4.65 nm, c = 41.3 nm, α = β = 90°, and γ = 120°. The column repeat unit is determined to possess a 12944 helix. With both donor (D; Pro) and acceptor (A; C60) units having their own connecting channels as well as the large D/A interface within the supramolecular “double‐cable” structure, PCD1 has photogenerated carriers with longer lifetimes compared to the conventional electron acceptor [6,6]‐phenyl‐C61‐butyric acid methyl ester. A phase‐separated columnar morphology is observed in a bulk‐heterojunction (BHJ) material made by the physical blend of a low band‐gap conjugated polymer, [poly[2,6‐(4,4‐bis‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐4H‐cyclopenta [2,1‐b;3,4‐b′]‐dithiophene)‐alt‐4,7‐(2,1,3‐benzothia‐diazole)]…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
H2 with PCPDTBT as donor showed a PCE of 3.36%.
“With a low band-gap polymer of PCPDTBT as the donor, it showed a PCE of 3.36%.”
From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [129]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.681 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.713 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.701 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.072065599 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr900327d · DOI
- 10.1088/0034-4885/67/3/R02 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.01.040 · DOI
- 10.1039/B614883M · DOI
- 10.1021/cr990322p · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201002884 · DOI
- 10.1021/ar100084y · DOI
- 10.1021/ar900228v · DOI
- 10.1021/ar8000926 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.200604203 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr030070z · DOI
- 10.1039/c003088k · DOI
- 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.10.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.200903697 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr050149z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.solmat.2004.02.030 · DOI
- 10.1039/B311370A · DOI
- 10.1039/b201558g · DOI
- 10.1002/1521-4095(200112)13:24<1871::AID-ADMA1871>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja015614y · DOI
- 10.1039/b008072l · DOI
- 10.1002/ange.19961080627 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.201100399 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0021889811014208 · DOI
- 10.1039/c1sm05381g · DOI
- 10.1002/chem.200401312 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja202485s · DOI
- 10.1021/ja004104l · DOI
- 10.1021/ja993959z · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.19970090704 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja9628415 · DOI
- 10.1002/anie.201007065 · DOI
- 10.1021/ar040168f · DOI
- 10.1021/ja038178j · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.072006599 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja990618c · DOI
- 10.1021/ja992165h · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2911 · DOI
- 10.1021/cm800383q · DOI
- Lotz B., 1993, Materials Science and Technology
- 10.1021/ma900852r · DOI
- 10.1021/ja801451e · DOI
- 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00036-5 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.125210 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.085206 · DOI
- 10.1002/adfm.201001271 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.200600160 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.200501717 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells
Mahmood, A., Hu, J.-Y., Xiao, B., Tang, A., Wang, X., & Zhou, E. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c8ta06392c · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, C., Zhang, W., Sun, H., Van Horn, R. M., Kulkarni, R. R., Tsai, C., Hsu, C., Lotz, B., Gong, X., & Cheng, S. Z. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Akron (US)
- National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
- Institut Charles Sadron (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Gong, Xiong
- Cheng, Stephen Z. D.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-07
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1375-1382
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W1991755958
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of California, Santa Barbara
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Fullerene Chemistry and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
- Keywords
- columnar phase, thermotropic phase transition, fullerene acceptors, polymer solar cells, bulk heterojunction, PCPDTBT, phase separation, carrier lifetime, hexagonal lattice, donor-acceptor interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review