The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐Throughput Computational Screening of New Li‐Ion Battery Anode Materials
Abstract
We use density functional theory (DFT) in conjunction with grand canonical linear programming (GCLP), a powerful automated tool for analyzing ground state thermodynamics, to exhaustively enumerate the 515 thermodynamically stable lithiation reactions of transition metal silicides, stannides and phosphides, and compute cell potential, volume expansion, and capacity for each. These reactions comprise an exhaustive list of all possible thermodynamically stable ternary conversion reactions for these transition metal compounds. The reactions are calculated based on a library DFT energies of 291 compounds, including all transition metal silicides, phosphides and stannides found in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). We screen our computational database for the most appealing anode properties based on gravimetric capacity, volumetric capacity, cell potential, and volume expansion when compared with graphitic carbon anodes. This high‐throughput computational approach points towards several promising anode compositions with properties significantly superior to graphitic carbon, including CoSi 2, TiP and NiSi 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thackeray, M. M., Wolverton, C., & Isaacs, E. D. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21892e · Cited by 2,515
Self-citationBelsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L., & Luksch, P. (2002) · Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science · doi:10.1107/s0108768102006948 · Cited by 1,379
Cited by
Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B., & Wolverton, C. (2013) · JOM · doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 · Cited by 2,584
Self-citationThe Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies
Kirklin, S., Saal, J. E., Meredig, B., Thompson, A., Doak, J. W., Aykol, M., Rühl, S., & Wolverton, C. (2015) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 · Cited by 2,378
Self-citationA general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials
Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A., & Wolverton, C. (2016) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citationEames, C., & Islam, M. S. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja508154e · Cited by 688
Nanoparticle decoration with surfactants: Molecular interactions, assembly, and applications
Heinz, H., Pramanik, C., Heinz, O., Ding, Y., Mishra, R. K., Marchon, D., Flatt, R. J., Estrela-Lopis, I., Llop, J., Moya, S., et al. (2017) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2017.02.001 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirklin, S., Meredig, B., & Wolverton, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 252-262
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2113072508
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Throughput Computational Screening of New Li‐Ion Battery Anode Materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201200593
- The paper
- Kirklin, S., Meredig, B., & Wolverton, C. (2013). High‐Throughput Computational Screening of New Li‐Ion Battery Anode Materials. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201200593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.