Cited by 1,379Machine Learning in Materials ScienceCrystal structures of chemical compoundsCrystal Structures and Properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New developments in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD): accessibility in support of materials research and design

Belsky, Alec, Hellenbrandt, Mariette, Karen, Vicky Lynn, Luksch, Peter·2002·Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science

Abstract

The materials community in both science and industry use crystallographic data models on a daily basis to visualize, explain and predict the behavior of chemicals and materials. Access to reliable information on the structure of crystalline materials helps researchers concentrate experimental work in directions that optimize the discovery process. The Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) is a comprehensive collection of more than 60 000 crystal structure entries for inorganic materials and is produced cooperatively by Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe (FIZ), Germany, and the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The ICSD is disseminated in computerized formats with scientific software tools to exploit the content of the database. Features of a new Windows-based graphical user interface for the ICSD are outlined, together with directions for future development in support of materials research and design.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1107/s0108768102006948

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental approaches over decades have catalogued 20,000 computationally stable structures out of 200,000 entries in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database.

    “Experimental approaches over the decades have catalogued 20,000 computationally stable structures (out of a total of 200,000 entries) in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD)15,18.”

    From Scaling deep learning for materials discovery (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L., & Luksch, P.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • FIZ Karlsruhe – Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure (DE)
Venue
Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
Published
2002-05-29
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
364-369
ISSN
0108-7681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112845989
Cited by
1,379
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 29
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acta Crystallographica Section B Structural Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Crystal structures of chemical compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Crystal Structures and Properties
Keywords
Inorganic Crystal Structure Database, crystallographic data, inorganic materials, database accessibility, graphical user interface, materials discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review