The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Degradation Mechanisms of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode Material in Lithium Ion Batteries
Abstract
LiNixCoyMnzO 2 (NCM, 0 ≤ x,y,z < 1) has become one of the most important cathode materials for next‐generation lithium (Li) ion batteries due to its high capacity and cost effectiveness compared with LiCoO 2. However, the high‐voltage operation of NCM (>4.3 V) required for high capacity is inevitably accompanied by a more rapid capacity fade over numerous cycles. Here, the degradation mechanisms of LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 are investigated during cycling under various cutoff voltage conditions. The surface lattice structures of LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 are observed to suffer from an irreversible transformation; the type of transformation depends on the cutoff voltage conditions. The surface of the pristine rhombohedral phase tends to transform into a mixture of spinel and rock salt phases. Moreover, the formation of the rock salt phase is more dominant under a higher voltage operation (≈4.8 V), which is attributable to the highly oxidative environment that triggers the oxygen loss from the surface of the material. The presence of the ionically insulating rock salt phase may result in sluggish kinetics, thus deteriorating the capacity retention. This implies that the prevention of surface structural degradation can provide the means to produce and retain high capacity, as well as stabilize the cycle life of LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 during high‐voltage operations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Degradation diagnostics for lithium ion cells
Birkl, C. R., Roberts, M. R., McTurk, E., Bruce, P. G., & Howey, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 · Cited by 1,945
Koerver, R., Aygün, I., Leichtweiß, T., Dietrich, C., Zhang, W., Binder, J. O., Hartmann, P., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 · Cited by 1,020
Qiu, B., Zhang, M., Wu, L., Wang, J., Xia, Y., Qian, D., Liu, H., Hy, S., Chen, Y., An, K., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12108 · Cited by 734
Recent advances of thermal safety of lithium ion battery for energy storage
Lyu, P., Liu, X., Qu, J., Zhao, J., Huo, Y., Qu, Z., & Rao, Z. (2020) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.042 · Cited by 624
Gaussian Process Regression for In Situ Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Richardson, R. R., Birkl, C. R., Osborne, M. A., & Howey, D. A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2794997 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, S., Gwon, H., Hong, J., Park, K., Seo, D., Kim, H., Hyun, J., Yang, W., & Kang, K.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-21
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W1948021995
- Cited by
- 1,124
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the Degradation Mechanisms of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode Material in Lithium Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201300787
- The paper
- Jung, S., Gwon, H., Hong, J., Park, K., Seo, D., Kim, H., Hyun, J., Yang, W., & Kang, K. (2014). Understanding the Degradation Mechanisms of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 Cathode Material in Lithium Ion Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.