The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Advances in Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
The rapidly increasing demand for electrical and hybrid vehicles and stationary energy storage requires the development of “beyond Li‐ion batteries” with high energy densities that exceed those of state‐of‐the‐art Li‐ion batteries. Li–S batteries, which have very high theoretical capacities and energy densities, are believed to be one of the most promising candidates. The sulfur‐based electrochemical reaction requires novel electrolytes to replace the classical carbonate‐based electrolyte systems inherited from Li‐ion batteries because carbonates are incompatible with the intermediate polysulfides in Li–S batteries. In addition, the theoretical specific capacities and projected energy densities of Li–S batteries are difficult to achieve experimentally, mainly because of the electronically insulating nature of sulfur and lithium sulfide cathodes, and the shuttle effect; this is a serious issue associated with the dissolution and diffusion of soluble polysulfides in most potential electrolytes and causes rapid capacity fading. It is therefore highly desirable to explore, modify, and/or optimize electrolytes for Li–S batteries to address these issues and improve their capacities, cycling stabilities, rate performances, and energy densities. An overview of recent developments in electrolytes for Li–S batteries is provided with a focus on the chemistry of polysulfides in different electrolyte media, including polysulfide solubility and its relevance to battery performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Fluoroethylene Carbonate Additives to Render Uniform Li Deposits in Lithium Metal Batteries
Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Chen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201605989 · Cited by 1,699
Automotive Li-Ion Batteries: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Ding, Y., Cano, Z. P., Yu, A., Lu, J., & Chen, Z. (2019) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-018-0022-z · Cited by 1,370
Formulating energy density for designing practical lithium–sulfur batteries
Zhou, G., Chen, H., & Cui, Y. (2022) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-022-01001-0 · Cited by 983
Advances in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Tian, H., Su, D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003666 · Cited by 870
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Ueno, K., Dokko, K., & Watanabe, M.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-27
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2014155497
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Advances in Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201500117
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Ueno, K., Dokko, K., & Watanabe, M. (2015). Recent Advances in Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.