Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 985

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hard Carbon Microspheres: Potassium‐Ion Anode Versus Sodium‐Ion Anode

Jian, Zelang, Xing, Zhenyu, Bommier, Clement, Li, Zhifei, Ji, Xiulei·2016·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Hard carbon microspheres (HCS) exhibit a highly reversible capacity of 262 mAh g−1 for K-ion batteries. They present a superior rate capability for K-ions to Na-ions, where at 2C, HCS/K cells deliver 190 mAh g−1 in contrast to 97 mAh g−1 from HCS/Na cells. It is determined that the K-ion diffusion coefficient of HCS is higher than that of Na-ions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201501874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 985

Metadata

Authors
Jian, Z., Xing, Z., Bommier, C., Li, Z., & Ji, X.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-30
Volume
6
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2184574649
Cited by
985
References
1
FWCI
33.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hard Carbon Microspheres: Potassium‐Ion Anode Versus Sodium‐Ion Anode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201501874
The paper
Jian, Z., Xing, Z., Bommier, C., Li, Z., & Ji, X. (2016). Hard Carbon Microspheres: Potassium‐Ion Anode Versus Sodium‐Ion Anode. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501874

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.