The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D‐Printed Cathodes of LiMn1−xFexPO4 Nanocrystals Achieve Both Ultrahigh Rate and High Capacity for Advanced Lithium‐Ion Battery
Abstract
A 3D‐printing technology and printed 3D lithium‐ion batteries (3D‐printed LIBs) based on LiMn 0.21 Fe 0.79 PO 4@C (LMFP) nanocrystal cathodes are developed to achieve both ultrahigh rate and high capacity. Coin cells with 3D‐printed cathodes show impressive electrochemical performance: a capacity of 108.45 mAh g−1 at 100 C and a reversible capacity of 150.21 mAh g−1 at 10 C after 1000 cycles. In combination with simulation using a pseudo 2D hidden Markov model and experimental data of 3D‐printed and traditional electrodes, for the first time deep insight into how to achieve the ultrahigh rate performance for a cathode with LMFP nanocrystals is obtained. It is estimated that the Li‐ion diffusion in LMFP nanocrystal is not the rate‐limitation step for the rate to 100 C, however, that the electrolyte diffusion factors, such as solution intrinsic diffusion coefficient, efficiency porosity, and electrode thickness, will dominate ultrahigh rate performance of the cathode. Furthermore, the calculations indicate that the above factors play important roles in the equivalent diffusion coefficient with the electrode beyond a certain thickness, which determines the whole kinetic process in LIBs. This fundamental study should provide helpful guidance for future design of LIBs with superior electrochemical performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221597 · Cited by 4,328
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
3D printing technologies for electrochemical energy storage
Zhang, F., Wei, M., Viswanathan, V. V., Swart, B., Shao, Y., Wu, G., & Zhou, C. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.037 · Cited by 494
Additive Manufacturing of Batteries
Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906244 · Cited by 298
Nanostructured positive electrode materials for post-lithium ion batteries
Wang, F., Wu, X., Li, C., Zhu, Y., Fu, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee02070d · Cited by 293
Brown, E., Yan, P., Tekik, H., Elangovan, A., Wang, J., Lin, D., & Li, J. (2019) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107689 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, J., Jiang, Y., Cui, S., Duan, Y., Liu, T., Guo, H., Lin, L., Lin, Y., Zheng, J., Amine, K., & Pan, F.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-06-23
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 18
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2469586551
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D‐Printed Cathodes of LiMn1−xFexPO4 Nanocrystals Achieve Both Ultrahigh Rate and High Capacity for Advanced Lithium‐Ion Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201600856
- The paper
- Hu, J., Jiang, Y., Cui, S., Duan, Y., Liu, T., Guo, H., Lin, L., Lin, Y., Zheng, J., Amine, K., & Pan, F. (2016). 3D‐Printed Cathodes of LiMn1−xFexPO4 Nanocrystals Achieve Both Ultrahigh Rate and High Capacity for Advanced Lithium‐Ion Battery. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.