Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Urea‐Modified Carbon Nitrides: Enhancing Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Rational Defect Engineering

Open access
Lau, Vincent Wing‐hei, Yu, Victor Wen‐zhe, Ehrat, Florian, Botari, Tiago, Moudrakovski, Igor, Simon, Thomas, Duppel, Viola, Medina, Elise, Stolarczyk, Jacek K., Feldmann, Jochen, Blum, Volker, Lotsch, Bettina V.·2017·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

The primary amine groups on the heptazine‐based polymer melon, also known as graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4), can be replaced by urea groups using a two‐step postsynthetic functionalization. Under simulated sunlight and optimum Pt loading, this urea‐functionalized carbon nitride has one of the highest activities among organic and polymeric photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution with methanol as sacrificial donor, reaching an apparent quantum efficiency of 18% and nearly 30 times the hydrogen evolution rate compared to the nonfunctionalized counterpart. In the absence of Pt, the urea‐derivatized material evolves hydrogen at a rate over four times that of the nonfunctionalized one. Since “defects” are conventionally accepted to be the active sites in graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalysis, the work here is a demonstrated example of “defect engineering,” where the catalytically relevant defect is inserted rationally for improving the intrinsic, rather than extrinsic, photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, the work provides a retrodictive explanation for the general observation that g‐C 3 N 4 prepared from urea performs better than those prepared from dicyandiamide and melamine. In‐depth analyses of the spent photocatalysts and computational modeling suggest that inserting the urea group causes a metal‐support interaction with the Pt cocatalyst, thus facilitating interfacial charge transfer to the hydrogen evolving centers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201602251

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Lau, V. W., Yu, V. W., Ehrat, F., Botari, T., Moudrakovski, I., Simon, T., Duppel, V., Medina, E., Stolarczyk, J. K., Feldmann, J., Blum, V., & Lotsch, B. V.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-27
Volume
7
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2580674868
Cited by
304
References
67
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urea‐Modified Carbon Nitrides: Enhancing Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Rational Defect Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201602251
The paper
Lau, V. W., Yu, V. W., Ehrat, F., Botari, T., Moudrakovski, I., Simon, T., Duppel, V., Medina, E., Stolarczyk, J. K., Feldmann, J., Blum, V., & Lotsch, B. V. (2017). Urea‐Modified Carbon Nitrides: Enhancing Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution by Rational Defect Engineering. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602251

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.