The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High and Reversible Lithium Ion Storage in Self‐Exfoliated Triazole‐Triformyl Phloroglucinol‐Based Covalent Organic Nanosheets
Abstract
Covalent organic framework (COF) can grow into self‐exfoliated nanosheets. Their graphene/graphite resembling microtexture and nanostructure suits electrochemical applications. Here, covalent organic nanosheets (CON) with nanopores lined with triazole and phloroglucinol units, neither of which binds lithium strongly, and its potential as an anode in Li‐ion battery are presented. Their fibrous texture enables facile amalgamation as a coin‐cell anode, which exhibits exceptionally high specific capacity of ≈720 mA h g−1 (@100 mA g−1). Its capacity is retained even after 1000 cycles. Increasing the current density from 100 mA g−1 to 1 A g−1 causes the specific capacity to drop only by 20%, which is the lowest among all high‐performing anodic COFs. The majority of the lithium insertion follows an ultrafast diffusion‐controlled intercalation (diffusion coefficient, DLi+ = 5.48 × 10−11 cm 2 s−1). The absence of strong Li‐framework bonds in the density functional theory (DFT) optimized structure supports this reversible intercalation. The discrete monomer of the CON shows a specific capacity of only 140 mA h g−1 @50 mA g−1 and no sign of lithium intercalation reveals the crucial role played by the polymeric structure of the CON in this intercalation‐assisted conductivity. The potentials mapped using DFT suggest a substantial electronic driving‐force for the lithium intercalation. The findings underscore the potential of the designer CON as anode material for Li‐ion batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Where do batteries end and supercapacitors begin?
Simon, P., Gogotsi, Y., & Dunn, B. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1249625 · Cited by 5,634
High oxygen-reduction activity and durability of nitrogen-doped graphene
Geng, D., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Li, R., Sun, X., Ye, S., & Knights, S. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00326c · Cited by 1,219
Cited by
Liu, R., Tan, K. T., Gong, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Z., Xie, S., He, T., Lu, Z., Yang, H., & Jiang, D. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00620c · Cited by 1,083
Metadata
- Authors
- Haldar, S., Roy, K., Nandi, S., Chakraborty, D., Puthusseri, D., Gawli, Y., Ogale, S., & Vaidhyanathan, R.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2768192251
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High and Reversible Lithium Ion Storage in Self‐Exfoliated Triazole‐Triformyl Phloroglucinol‐Based Covalent Organic Nanosheets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201702170
- The paper
- Haldar, S., Roy, K., Nandi, S., Chakraborty, D., Puthusseri, D., Gawli, Y., Ogale, S., & Vaidhyanathan, R. (2018). High and Reversible Lithium Ion Storage in Self‐Exfoliated Triazole‐Triformyl Phloroglucinol‐Based Covalent Organic Nanosheets. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.