The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Porphyrin‐Derived Graphene‐Based Nanosheets Enabling Strong Polysulfide Chemisorption and Rapid Kinetics in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries hold great promise as a next‐generation battery system because of their extremely high theoretical energy density and low cost. However, ready lithium polysulfide (LiPS) diffusion and sluggish redox kinetics hamper their cyclability and rate capability. Herein, porphyrin‐derived graphene‐based nanosheets (PNG) are proposed for Li–S batteries, which are achieved by pyrolyzing a conformal and thin layer of 2D porphyrin organic framework on graphene to form carbon nanosheets with a spatially engineered nitrogen‐dopant‐enriched skin and a highly conductive skeleton. The atomic skin is decorated with fully exposed lithiophilic sites to afford strong chemisorption to LiPSs and improve electrolyte wettability, while graphene substrate provides speedy electron transport to facilitate redox kinetics of sulfur species. The use of PNG as a lightweight interlayer enables efficient operation of Li–S batteries in terms of superb cycle stability (cyclic decay rate of 0.099% during 300 cycles at 0.5 C), good rate capability (988 mAh g−1 at 2.0 C), and impressive sulfur loading (areal capacity of 8.81 mAh cm−2 at a sulfur loading of 8.9 mg cm−2). The distinct interfacial strategy is expected to apply to other conversion reaction batteries relying on dissolution–precipitation mechanisms and requiring interfacial charge‐ and mass‐transport‐mediation concurrently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, H., Maiyalagan, T., & Wang, X. (2012) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs200652y · Cited by 3,618
Cited by
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Hou, L.-P., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2020.10.021 · Cited by 283
Self-citationStrategies to anode protection in lithium metal battery: A review
Li, J., Kong, Z., Liu, X., Zheng, B., Fan, Q. H., Garratt, E., Schuelke, T., Wang, K., Xu, H., & Jin, H. (2021) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12189 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, L., Li, B., Peng, H., Zhang, R., Xie, J., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-04-19
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 20
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2801619633
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porphyrin‐Derived Graphene‐Based Nanosheets Enabling Strong Polysulfide Chemisorption and Rapid Kinetics in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201800849
- The paper
- Kong, L., Li, B., Peng, H., Zhang, R., Xie, J., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2018). Porphyrin‐Derived Graphene‐Based Nanosheets Enabling Strong Polysulfide Chemisorption and Rapid Kinetics in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800849
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.