The DOI matches its Crossref record; 438 of the 438 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Lithium–sulfur batteries are a major focus of academic and industrial energy‐storage research due to their high theoretical energy density and the use of low‐cost materials. The high energy density results from the conversion mechanism that lithium–sulfur cells utilize. The sulfur cathode, being naturally abundant and environmentally friendly, makes lithium–sulfur batteries a potential next‐generation energy‐storage technology. The current state of the research indicates that lithium–sulfur cells are now at the point of transitioning from laboratory‐scale devices to a more practical energy‐storage application. Based on similar electrochemical conversion reactions, the low‐cost sulfur cathode can be coupled with a wide range of metallic anodes, such as sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, and aluminum. These new “metal–sulfur” systems exhibit great potential in either lowering the production cost or producing high energy density. Inspired by the rapid development of lithium–sulfur batteries and the prospect of metal–sulfur cells, here, over 450 research articles are summarized to analyze the research progress and explore the electrochemical characteristics, cell‐assembly parameters, cell‐testing conditions, and materials design. In addition to highlighting the current research progress, the possible future areas of research which are needed to bring conversion‐type lithium–sulfur and other metal–sulfur batteries into the market are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J.-M., & Armand, M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,130
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,197
30 Years of Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Li, M., Lu, J., Chen, Z., & Amine, K. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800561 · Cited by 6,039
A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
Ji, X., Lee, K. T., & Nazar, L. F. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2460 · Cited by 5,988
Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries
Xu, W., Wang, J., Ding, F., Chen, X., Nasybulin, E., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J.-G. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee40795k · Cited by 4,704
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Self-citationSlater, M. D., Kim, D., Lee, E., & Johnson, C. S. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201200691 · Cited by 4,518
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Electrochemistry, Materials, and Prospects
Yin, Y., Xin, S., Guo, Y., & Wan, L. (2013) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201304762 · Cited by 2,707
Cited by
Current status and future directions of multivalent metal-ion batteries
Liang, Y., Dong, H., Aurbach, D., & Yao, Y. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0655-0 · Cited by 1,521
Emerging Catalysts to Promote Kinetics of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Wang, P., Xi, B., Huang, M., Chen, W., Feng, J., & Xiong, S. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202002893 · Cited by 451
Ng, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Hou, L.-P., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2020.10.021 · Cited by 283
Defect Engineering for Expediting Li–S Chemistry: Strategies, Mechanisms, and Perspectives
Shi, Z., Li, M., Sun, J., & Chen, Z. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202100332 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, S., & Manthiram, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-05-13
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- e1901125-e1901125
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2945986935
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 438
- FWCI
- 27.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201901125
- The paper
- Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019). Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.