In Situ “Chainmail Catalyst” Assembly in Low‐Tortuosity, Hierarchical Carbon Frameworks for Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Generation
Abstract
The chainmail catalysts (transition metals or metal alloys encapsulated in carbon) are regarded as stable and efficient electrocatalysts for hydrogen generation. However, the fabrication of chainmail catalysts usually involves complex chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or prolonged calcination in a furnace, and the slurry‐based electrode assembly of the chainmail catalysts often suffers from inferior mass transfer and an underutilized active surface. In this work, a freestanding wood‐based open carbon framework is designed embedded with nitrogen (N) doped, few‐graphene‐layer‐encapsulated nickel iron (NiFe) alloy nanoparticles (N‐C‐NiFe). 3D wood‐derived carbon framework with numerous open and low‐tortuosity lumens, which are decorated with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) “villi”, can facilitate electrolyte permeation and hydrogen gas removal. The chainmail catalysts of the N‐C‐NiFe are uniformly in situ assembled on the CNT “villi” using a rapid heat shock treatment. The high heating and quenching rates of the heat shock method lead to formation of the well‐dispersed ultrafine nanoparticles. The self‐supported wood‐based carbon framework decorated with the chainmail catalyst displays high electrocatalytic activity and superior cycling durability for hydrogen evolution. The unique heat shock method offers a promising strategy to rapidly synthesize well‐dispersed binary and polynary metallic nanoparticles in porous matrices for high‐efficiency electrochemical energy storage and conversion…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nano-structured 3D wood aerogel-based nanoelectrode with open and direct microchannels benefits ion/gas transportation, contributing to good activity.
“More interestingly, the nano-structured 3D wood aerogel-based nanoelectrode that has the open and direct microchannels repels seawater precipitates and benefits the ion/gas transportation, contributing to good activity [49,50].”
From Wood aerogel-derived sandwich-like layered nanoelectrodes for alkaline overall seawater electrosplitting (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
The nano-structured 3D wood aerogel-based nanoelectrode with open and direct microchannels repels seawater precipitates.
“More interestingly, the nano-structured 3D wood aerogel-based nanoelectrode that has the open and direct microchannels repels seawater precipitates and benefits the ion/gas transportation, contributing to good activity [49,50].”
From Wood aerogel-derived sandwich-like layered nanoelectrodes for alkaline overall seawater electrosplitting (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution
Voiry, D., Yamaguchi, H., Li, J., Silva, R., Alves, D. C. B., Fujita, T., Chen, M., Asefa, T., Shenoy, V. B., Eda, G., et al. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3700 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
Merki, D., Vrubel, H., Rovelli, L., Fierro, S., & Hu, X. (2012) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c2sc20539d · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Qiu, H. ‐., Ito, Y., Cong, W., Tan, Y., Liu, P., Hirata, A., Fujita, T., Tang, Z., & Chen, M. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201507381 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Cui, C., Gan, L., Li, H.-H., Yu, S.-H., Heggen, M., & Strasser, P. (2012) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl3032795 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Ma, Z., Duan, J., Liu, H., Liu, G., Wang, T., Chang, K., Li, M., Shi, L., Meng, X., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b05728 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, H., Zou, Y., Li, J., Zhang, K., Xia, Y., Hui, B., & Yang, D. (2021) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120215 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Liu, R., Gong, Z., Liu, J., Dong, J., Liao, J., Liu, H., Huang, H., Liu, J., Yan, M., Huang, K., et al. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202103533 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, Y., Gao, T., Yao, Y., Liu, Z., Kuang, Y., Chen, C., Song, J., Xu, S., Hitz, E. M., Liu, B., Jacob, R. J., Zachariah, M. R., Wang, G., & Hu, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Liangbing
- ORCID
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-29
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 25
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2886367340
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1635221, ACI‐1053575)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Keywords
- hydrogen evolution reaction, carbon nanotubes, heat shock treatment, nitrogen-doped carbon, electrocatalyst stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review