The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Burgeoning Prospects of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries in Multifarious Applications
Abstract
Where sustainability is concerned, recycling of reutilizable wastes will always occupy the apex of the green chemistry research. Handling electronic wastes in a green manner without affecting the ecology and human health is one of the main challenges for material chemists and gains top priority among other fields of research. At present, handling and recycling of spent lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) is a key priority. Due to these environmental concerns, massive interest has been triggered in various crystal structures of metal oxides, and different kinds of carbon materials that provide the opportunities to replace the commercial LIBs for energy storage and conversion applications in a cost‐effective manner. Reports are available on the recycling of spent LIBs, but these reports mainly focus on the metal recovery process rather than finding suitable applications for the recovered material. This present work exclusively summarizes the global demand for LIB raw materials, tactics in the resynthesis process along with the wide range of growing applications of spent LIB materials. Finally, the future prospects of applications that utilize spent LIB materials are addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries
Vaalma, C., Buchholz, D., Weil, M., & Passerini, S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.13 · Cited by 2,613
Degradation diagnostics for lithium ion cells
Birkl, C. R., Roberts, M. R., McTurk, E., Bruce, P. G., & Howey, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 · Cited by 1,945
Zhang, Y., Guo, X., Wu, F., Yao, Y., Yuan, Y., Bi, X., Luo, X., Shahbazian-Yassar, R., Zhang, C., & Amine, K. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b05458 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
An Urgent Call to Spent LIB Recycling: Whys and Wherefores for Graphite Recovery
Natarajan, S., & Aravindan, V. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202002238 · Cited by 319
Self-citationThe 2021 battery technology roadmap
Ma, J., Li, Y., Grundish, N. S., Goodenough, J. B., Chen, Y., Guo, L., Peng, Z., Qi, X., Yang, F., Qie, L., et al. (2021) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6463/abd353 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Natarajan, S., & Aravindan, V.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 33
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2894891086
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Burgeoning Prospects of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries in Multifarious Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201802303
- The paper
- Natarajan, S., & Aravindan, V. (2018). Burgeoning Prospects of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries in Multifarious Applications. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201802303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.