The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ambient‐Pressure Relithiation of Degraded LixNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (0 < x < 1) via Eutectic Solutions for Direct Regeneration of Lithium‐Ion Battery Cathodes
Abstract
With the rapid growth of the lithium‐ion battery (LIBs) market, recycling and re‐use of end‐of‐life LIBs to reclaim lithium (Li) and transition metal (TM) resources (e.g., Co, Ni), as well as eliminating pollution from disposal of waste batteries, has become an urgent task. Here, for the first time the ambient‐pressure relithiation of degraded LiNi 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 O 2 (NCM523) cathodes via eutectic Li+ molten‐salt solutions is successfully demonstrated. Combining such a low‐temperature relithiation process with a well‐designed thermal annealing step, NCM523 cathode particles with significant Li loss (≈40%) and capacity degradation (≈50%) can be successfully regenerated to achieve their original composition and crystal structures, leading to effective recovery of their capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability to the levels of the pristine materials. Advanced characterization tools including atomic resolution electron microscopy imaging and electron energy loss spectroscopy are combined to demonstrate that NCM523's original layered crystal structure is recovered. For the first time, it is shown that layer‐to‐rock salt phase change on the surfaces and subsurfaces of the cathode materials can be reversed if lithium can be incorporated back to the material. The result suggests the great promise of using eutectic Li+ molten–salt solutions for ambient‐pressure relithiation to recycle and remanufacture degraded LIB cathode materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Cited by
Tan, D. H. S., Banerjee, A., Chen, Z., & Meng, Y. S. (2020) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-020-0657-x · Cited by 641
Self-citationMao, J., Ye, C., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Zeng, R., Davey, K., Guo, Z., & Qiao, S. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00162d · Cited by 365
Wang, J., Li, D., Zeng, W., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Li, Z., Li, C., & Mu, S. (2025) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2024.11.016 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, Y., Zhang, M., Meng, Y. S., & Chen, Z.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 20
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2936292114
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambient‐Pressure Relithiation of Degraded LixNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (0 < x < 1) via Eutectic Solutions for Direct Regeneration of Lithium‐Ion Battery Cathodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201900454
- The paper
- Shi, Y., Zhang, M., Meng, Y. S., & Chen, Z. (2019). Ambient‐Pressure Relithiation of Degraded LixNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 (0 < x < 1) via Eutectic Solutions for Direct Regeneration of Lithium‐Ion Battery Cathodes. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201900454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.