The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Difluorophosphate‐Based Dual‐Salt Low Concentration Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Batteries
Abstract
The safety hazards and low Coulombic efficiency originating from the growth of lithium dendrites and decomposition of the electrolyte restrict the practical application of Li metal batteries (LMBs). Inspired by the low cost of low concentration electrolytes (LCEs) in industrial applications, dual‐salt LCEs employing 0.1 m Li difluorophosphate (LiDFP) and 0.4 m LiBOB/LiFSI/LiTFSI are proposed to construct a robust and conductive interphase on a Li metal anode. Compared with the conventional electrolyte using 1 m LiPF 6, the ionic conductivity of LCEs is reduced but the conductivity decrement of the separator immersed in LCEs is moderate, especially for the LiDFP–LiFSI and LiDFP–LiTFSI electrolytes. The accurate Coulombic efficiency (CE) of the Li||Cu cells increases from 83.3% (electrolyte using 1 m LiPF 6) to 97.6%, 94.5%, and 93.6% for LiDFP–LiBOB, LiDFP–LiFSI, and LiDFP–LiTFSI electrolytes, respectively. The capacity retention of Li||LiFePO 4 cells using the LiDFP–LiBOB electrolyte reaches 95.4% along with a CE over 99.8% after 300 cycles at a current density of 2.0 mA cm−2 and the capacity reaches 103.7 mAh g−1 at a current density of up to 16.0 mA cm−2. This work provides a dual‐salt LCE for practical LMBs and presents a new perspective for the design of electrolytes for LMBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Fluoroethylene Carbonate Additives to Render Uniform Li Deposits in Lithium Metal Batteries
Zhang, X., Cheng, X., Chen, X., Yan, C., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201605989 · Cited by 1,699
Cited by
Confronting the Challenges in Lithium Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries
Wang, Q., Liu, B., Shen, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, Z., Zhong, C., & Hu, W. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202101111 · Cited by 531
Critical effects of electrolyte recipes for Li and Na metal batteries
Zheng, X., Huang, L., Ye, X., Zhang, J., Min, F., Luo, W., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2021.02.025 · Cited by 367
Wang, X., Wang, S., Wang, H., Tu, W., Zhao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Q., Wu, J., Fu, Y., Han, C., et al. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202007945 · Cited by 283
Insights into the deposition chemistry of Li ions in nonaqueous electrolyte for stable Li anodes
Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Li, J., Shi, Y., Sun, C., An, B., Cheng, H.-M., & Li, F. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01017k · Cited by 268
Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries
Tan, S., Shadike, Z., Cai, X., Lin, R., Kludze, A., Borodin, O., Lucht, B. L., Wang, C., Hu, E., Xu, K., et al. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00199-1 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, H., Xiang, H., Jiang, F., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Liang, X., Feng, Y., & Yu, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-06-22
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 30
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W3035821981
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium Difluorophosphate‐Based Dual‐Salt Low Concentration Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202001440
- The paper
- Zheng, H., Xiang, H., Jiang, F., Liu, Y., Sun, Y., Liang, X., Feng, Y., & Yu, Y. (2020). Lithium Difluorophosphate‐Based Dual‐Salt Low Concentration Electrolytes for Lithium Metal Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202001440
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.