The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single‐ or Poly‐Crystalline Ni‐Rich Layered Cathode, Sulfide or Halide Solid Electrolyte: Which Will be the Winners for All‐Solid‐State Batteries?
Abstract
Two newly emerging materials for application in all‐solid‐state batteries, namely, single‐crystalline Ni‐rich layered oxide cathode and halide solid electrolyte (SE), are of utmost interest because of their superior properties (good microstructural integrity and excellent electrochemical oxidation stability, respectively) to conventional polycrystalline layered oxides and sulfide SEs. In this work, four electrodes employing single‐ or polycrystalline LiNi 0.88 Co 0.11 Al 0.01 O 2 (NCA) and Li 3 YCl 6 or Li 6 PS 5 Cl 0.5 Br 0.5 are rigorously characterized by complementary analyses. It is shown that the synergy of employing cracking‐free single‐crystalline NCA and oxidation‐tolerable Li 3 YCl 6 can be achieved by considering intercoupled engineering factors that are prone to overlook, such as size, lightness, and mixing of particles. Accordingly, the highest level of performances in terms of discharge capacity (199 mA h g−1 at 0.1C), initial Coulombic efficiency (89.6%), cycling performance (96.8% of capacity retention at the 200th cycle), and rate capability (130 mA h g−1 at 4C) are demonstrated at 30 °C. Severe side reactions occurring at the Li 6 PS 5 Cl 0.5 Br 0.5/NCA interfaces are also quantified and probed. Importantly, an overlooked but significant contribution of the side reaction of Li 6 PS 5 Cl 0.5 Br 0.5 to the detrimental electrochemo‐mechanical degradation of polycrystalline NCA is revealed for the first time by postmortem scanning electron microscopy and operando electrochemical pressiometry measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries
Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901452z · Cited by 10,943
Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
Xu, K. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030203g · Cited by 7,437
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,197
Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities
Choi, J. W., & Aurbach, D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 · Cited by 5,110
High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors
Kato, Y., Hori, S., Saito, T., Suzuki, K., Hirayama, M., Mitsui, A., Yonemura, M., Iba, H., & Kanno, R. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.30 · Cited by 3,517
Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries
Han, X., Gong, Y., Fu, K., He, X., Hitz, G. T., Dai, J., Pearse, A., Liu, B., Wang, H., Rubloff, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4821 · Cited by 2,025
Zhu, Y., He, X., & Mo, Y. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b07517 · Cited by 1,936
Albertus, P., Babinec, S., Litzelman, S., & Newman, A. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0047-2 · Cited by 1,888
Lee, Y.-G., Fujiki, S., Jung, C., Suzuki, N., Yashiro, N., Omoda, R., Ko, D.-S., Shiratsuchi, T., Sugimoto, T., Ryu, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z · Cited by 1,708
High electronic conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes
Han, F., Westover, A. S., Yue, J., Fan, X., Wang, F., Chi, M., Leonard, D. N., Dudney, N. J., Wang, H., & Wang, C. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z · Cited by 1,695
Cited by
Kwak, H., Wang, S., Park, J., Liu, Y., Kim, K. T., Choi, Y., Mo, Y., & Jung, Y. S. (2022) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00438 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, Y., Jung, S. H., Kwak, H., Jun, S., Kwak, H. H., Lee, J. H., Hong, S., & Jung, Y. S.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-04-17
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 21
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W3153036406
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single‐ or Poly‐Crystalline Ni‐Rich Layered Cathode, Sulfide or Halide Solid Electrolyte: Which Will be the Winners for All‐Solid‐State Batteries? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202100126
- The paper
- Han, Y., Jung, S. H., Kwak, H., Jun, S., Kwak, H. H., Lee, J. H., Hong, S., & Jung, Y. S. (2021). Single‐ or Poly‐Crystalline Ni‐Rich Layered Cathode, Sulfide or Halide Solid Electrolyte: Which Will be the Winners for All‐Solid‐State Batteries? Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.