The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promises and Challenges of the Practical Implementation of Prelithiation in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Abstract
Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) have changed lives since their invention in the early 1990s. Further improvement of their energy density is highly desirable to meet the increasing demands of energy storage applications. Active lithium loss in the initial charge process appreciably reduces the capacity and energy density of LIBs due to the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI) on the anode surface, especially for Si based anodes in high‐energy‐density batteries. To solve this issue, prelithiation to provide additional active lithium into the battery has been widely accepted as one of the most promising strategies. Here, key parameters/issues for the practical implementation of prelithiation approaches in LIBs are discussed, including donable lithium‐ion capacity/prelithiation efficiency, chemical and ambient stability of the prelithiation materials/reagents, safety hazards of prelithiation, residues and side reactions during prelithiation, potential effect on electrochemical performance, industrial compatibility, and scalability of the prelithiation, many of which are often overlooked in academic literature. Moreover, insights are offered regarding the potential future directions in the development of this burgeoning field. Continuous progress in prelithiation is essential and urgent to enable next‐generation high‐energy‐density LIBs in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteries
Goodenough, J. B., & Kim, Y. (2010) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm901452z · Cited by 10,943
Promise and reality of post-lithium-ion batteries with high energy densities
Choi, J. W., & Aurbach, D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.13 · Cited by 5,110
The path towards sustainable energy
Chu, S., Cui, Y., & Liu, N. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4834 · Cited by 4,791
A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries
Verma, P., Maire, P., & Novák, P. (2010) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.072 · Cited by 2,903
Designing nanostructured Si anodes for high energy lithium ion batteries
Wu, H., & Cui, Y. (2012) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2012.08.004 · Cited by 2,350
The development and future of lithium ion batteries
Blomgren, G. E. (2017) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0251701jes · Cited by 1,940
An Outlook on Lithium Ion Battery Technology
Manthiram, A. (2017) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00288 · Cited by 1,771
Derrien, G., Hassoun, J., Panero, S., & Scrosati, B. (2007) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200700748 · Cited by 868
Prelithiated Silicon Nanowires as an Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries
Liu, N., Hu, L., McDowell, M. T., Jackson, A., & Cui, Y. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn2017167 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhan, R., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Seh, Z. W., Wang, L., & Sun, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-07-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 35
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W3184182318
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Promises and Challenges of the Practical Implementation of Prelithiation in Lithium‐Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202101565
- The paper
- Zhan, R., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Seh, Z. W., Wang, L., & Sun, Y. (2021). Promises and Challenges of the Practical Implementation of Prelithiation in Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202101565
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.