The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2+ Products by Adjusting the Local Reaction Environment with Polymer Binders
Open accessAbstract
The activity and selectivity of the electrochemical CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) are often hindered by the limited access of CO 2 to the catalyst surface and overtaken by the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. Herein, it is revealed that polymers used as catalyst binders can effectively modulate the accessibility of CO 2 relative to H 2 O at the vicinity of the catalyst and thus the performance of CO 2 RR. Three polymers with different hydrophilicities (i.e., polyacrylic acid (PAA), Nafion, and fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP)) are selected as binders for Cu catalysts. At a thickness of only ≈1.2 nm, these binders strongly affect the activity and selectivity toward multi‐carbon (C 2+) products. The FEP coated catalyst exhibits a C 2+ partial current density of over 600 mA cm−2 with ≈77% faradaic efficiency at −0.76 V versus RHE. This high performance is attributed to the hydrophobic (aerophilic) properties of FEP, which reduces the local concentration of H 2 O and enhances that of the reactant (i.e., CO 2) and the reaction intermediates (i.e., CO). These findings suggest that tuning the hydrophobicity of electrocatalysts with polymer binders can be a promising way to regulate the performance of electrochemical reactions involving gas–solid–liquid interfaces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes?
De Luna, P., Hahn, C., Higgins, D., Jaffer, S. A., Jaramillo, T. F., & Sargent, E. H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav3506 · Cited by 3,052
CO 2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm −2
García de Arquer, F. P., Dinh, C.-T., Ozden, A., Wicks, J., McCallum, C., Kirmani, A. R., Nam, D.-H., Gabardo, C., Seifitokaldani, A., Wang, X., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay4217 · Cited by 1,517
Ren, D., Deng, Y., Handoko, A. D., Chen, C. S., Malkhandi, S., & Yeo, B. S. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs502128q · Cited by 930
One-step electrosynthesis of ethylene and ethanol from CO2 in an alkaline electrolyzer
Ma, S., Sadakiyo, M., Luo, R., Heima, M., Yamauchi, M., & Kenis, P. J. A. (2016) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.124 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Chang, B., Pang, H., Raziq, F., Wang, S., Huang, K.-W., Ye, J., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee00964e · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Pham, T. H. M., Zhang, J., Li, M., Shen, T., Ko, Y., Tileli, V., Luo, W., & Züttel, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W4205540179
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2+ Products by Adjusting the Local Reaction Environment with Polymer Binders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202103663
- The paper
- Pham, T. H. M., Zhang, J., Li, M., Shen, T., Ko, Y., Tileli, V., Luo, W., & Züttel, A. (2022). Enhanced Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2+ Products by Adjusting the Local Reaction Environment with Polymer Binders. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202103663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.