The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covalent Organic Framework Based Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Materials, Interfaces, and Solid‐State Electrolytes
Open accessAbstract
Lithium–sulfur batteries are recognized as one of the most promising next‐generation energy‐storage technologies owing to their high energy density and low cost. Nevertheless, the shuttle effect of polysulfide intermediates and the formation of lithium dendrites are the principal reasons that restrict the practical adoption of current Li–S batteries. Adjustable frameworks, structural variety, and functional adaptability of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have the potential to overcome the issues associated with Li–S battery technology. Herein, a summary is presented of emerging COF materials in addressing the challenging problems in terms of sulfur hosts, modified separators, artificial solid electrolyte interphase layers, and solid‐state electrolytes. This comprehensive overview focuses on the design and chemistry of COFs used to upgrade Li–S batteries. Furthermore, existing difficulties, prospective remedies, and prospective research directions for COFs for Li–S batteries are discussed, laying the groundwork for future advancements in this class of fascinating materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks
Côté, A. P., Benin, A. I., Ockwig, N. W., O'Keeffe, M., Matzger, A. J., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1120411 · Cited by 8,357
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
Ji, X., Lee, K. T., & Nazar, L. F. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2460 · Cited by 5,988
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Covalent Organic Frameworks: Design, Synthesis, and Functions
Geng, K., He, T., Liu, R., Dalapati, S., Tan, K. T., Li, Z., Tao, S., Gong, Y., Jiang, Q., & Jiang, D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00550 · Cited by 4,064
Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries
Seh, Z. W., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., & Cui, Y. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00410a · Cited by 2,573
A pomegranate-inspired nanoscale design for large-volume-change lithium battery anodes
Liu, N., Lu, Z., Zhao, J., McDowell, M. T., Lee, H.-W., Zhao, W., & Cui, Y. (2014) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.6 · Cited by 2,491
Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes
Pang, Q., Liang, X., Kwok, C. Y., & Nazar, L. F. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.132 · Cited by 2,167
Chemistry of Covalent Organic Frameworks
Waller, P. J., Gándara, F., & Yaghi, O. M. (2015) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00369 · Cited by 1,897
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, B., Xu, J., Fan, Z., Xu, C., Han, S., Zhang, J., Ma, L., Ding, B., Zhuang, Z., Kang, Q., & Zhang, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-01-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W4319845309
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 20.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covalent Organic Framework Based Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Materials, Interfaces, and Solid‐State Electrolytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202203540
- The paper
- Hu, B., Xu, J., Fan, Z., Xu, C., Han, S., Zhang, J., Ma, L., Ding, B., Zhuang, Z., Kang, Q., & Zhang, X. (2023). Covalent Organic Framework Based Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Materials, Interfaces, and Solid‐State Electrolytes. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203540
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
