The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The postnatal development of the retina in the normal and rodless CBA mouse: A light and electron microscopic study
Abstract
The postnatal development of the retina in control (CBA/S) and rodless (CBA/Ki) mice was studied by light and electron microscopy. In the control mice, the major increase in retinal thickness occurs between birth and seven days. The inner and outer segments begin to grow into the optic ventricle between seven and ten days with their most rapid growth occurring between 12 to 15 days; by 35 days the retina appears mature. During development, the nuclear layers become thinner while the optic ventricle (layer of rods) and the plexiform layers become thicker. At birth, the mutant or rodless retina is indistinguishable from the control; however, the inner and outer segments fail to develop beyond the primitive seven‐ to ten‐day stage. At 15 days the outer nuclear layer becomes reduced to only a few nuclei in thickness. Many degenerating elements are found in the cavity of the optic ventricle and in the outer nuclear and plexiform layers. By 35 days the mutant retina lacks photoreceptors and is reduced in thickness to less than that at birth. The pigment epithelium is heightened in regions where degeneration is incomplete but becomes highly attenuated in regions where visual cell degeneration is complete. The optic ventricle contains the villous processes of the pigment epithelium and the fringe processes of the Müller cells. The outer limiting membrane is contiguous with remnants of the outer plexiform layer. Between the outer plexiform layer and the inner limiting membrane, the mutant retina is normal in appearance and dimension. The delayed appearance of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum of the pigment epithelium is implicated in the failure of outer segment maturation. The role of both Müller and pigment epithelial cells in removal of the products of retinal degeneration is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Circadian photoreception in the retinally degenerate mouse (rd/rd)
Foster, R. G., Provencio, I., Hudson, D., Fiske, S., De Grip, W., & Menaker, M. (1991) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00198171 · Cited by 508
Bilousova, T. V., Dansie, L., Ngo, M., Aye, J., Charles, J. R., Ethell, D. W., & Ethell, I. M. (2009) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2008.061796 · Cited by 465
Macrophages and the Nervous System
Perry, V. H., & Gordon, S. (1991) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61220-6 · Cited by 428
Retina-derived microglial cells induce photoreceptor cell death in vitro
Roque, R. S., Rosales, A. A., Jingjing, L., Agarwal, N., & Al-Ubaidi, M. R. (1999) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01625-x · Cited by 101
Gene Therapy for Inherited Retinal Degeneration
Arbabi, A., Liu, A., & Ameri, H. (2019) · Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/jop.2018.0087 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Caley, D. W., Johnson, C., & Liebelt, R. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1972-02
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-211
- ISSN
- 0002-9106 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-0795
- OpenAlex
- W2001488073
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The postnatal development of the retina in the normal and rodless CBA mouse: A light and electron microscopic study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aja.1001330205
- The paper
- Caley, D. W., Johnson, C., & Liebelt, R. A. (1972). The postnatal development of the retina in the normal and rodless CBA mouse: A light and electron microscopic study. American Journal of Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001330205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.